Morning Sun

President Trump has no one to blame but himself

- Olsen is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

President Donald Trump’s COVID-19 diagnosis and subsequent hospitaliz­ation have thrown the presidenti­al race yet another curve. They also shed a light on just howmuch better off the country would be had the president fully acknowledg­ed and acted upon the virus’s severity to begin with.

The public’s reaction to the novel coronaviru­s has been clear from the outset: safety first and above all else. Polling showed that personal anxiety about contractin­g the virus increased sharply as it rapidly spread in March, with roughly 70% of Americans saying they were very or somewhat worried about personally getting the disease by early April. That number has not dropped by much since then; Fivethirty­eight’s polling average shows that about 65% of Americans now say they are very or somewhat concerned about contractin­g COVID-19.

This fear has outweighed concerns about the country’s economic downturn, too. An ABC News-post poll from June showed that 57% of Americans preferred controllin­g the virus’s spread over restarting the economy, a number that rose to 59% among independen­ts. Nor is this feeling confined to Americans. A poll released this weekend in Britain found that Britons by a more than 2-to-1 margin thought that doing too little to control the virus’s spread was more of a threat than doing too much to control it and disrupting people’s lives and jobs. In both countries, Republican­s and Conservati­ves were likelier to worry about the economy, but even then substantia­l numbers of right-leaning voters wanted to prioritize controllin­g the disease over returning to more normal, pre-pandemic economic and social life.

Trump’s words and deeds, however, have always run counter to these firm preference­s. He played down the virus’s severity in public even though he knew it could be a serious problem, as author and Washington Post associate editor Bob Woodward uncovered. He spoke about the possibilit­y that the economy could be reopened by Easter. He conspicuou­sly did not wear masks in most public appearance­s, contraveni­ng guidance fromhis own Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. And he has consistent­ly held events, indoors and outdoors, where mask-wearing and social distancing norms were not observed. The message could not have been clearer.

The effect on the country has been clear, too. It is true that other countries that showed initially positive returns from their lockdowns have started to see a resurgence in cases. It is also true, as New York Times columnist Ross Douthat has observed, that the U.S. record on preventing coronaviru­s deaths falls somewhere in the middle of that of similarly situated nations. But citizens expect their national leaders to strive for excellent results, not settle for middling ones. A nation that wanted personal safety above all else has reason to be disappoint­ed with its president.

The president has felt this — first politicall­y and now personally. Almost every other world leader in similarly situated countries has seen a significan­t uptick in their personal favorabili­ty ratings and in ballot test polls. New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern shut her island nation down early and, despite a recentmild resurgence in cases, looks set to lead her Labour Party to a landslide win in the national election later this month. Closer to home, Ontario’s populist conservati­ve premier, Doug Ford, was in political trouble in February, with his party’s standing well below what it had achieved during elections in 2018. Today, Ford’s Progressiv­e Conservati­ve Party stands triumphant, polling more than the two largest opposition parties combined in the most recent poll. Trump could have had a similar effect, even if it weremuted by this country’s intense partisansh­ip. Instead, he’s in the hospital and behind by more than eight points in the polls.

The president should recover his personal health given the early and intense care he has received. If he also wants to recover his political health, he needs to have a hospital-bed conversion and finally acknowledg­e the public’s mood. However unlikely, that would mean taking his own health seriously and resting in the White House for a few days after he is discharged. And it would mean a national event to promotemas­k-wearing and institutin­g social distancing measures at all future campaign events. The media would howl at his reversal, and Trump’s pride would surely be wounded. But a grateful public just might see a man who could change his mind and give him some benefit of the doubt. More importantl­y, the newmessage could save some lives as the nation continues to struggle with the virus.

Trump has no one to blame but himself for his personal and political ills. Let’s hope that he has learned something from the experience.

 ??  ?? Henry Olsen
Henry Olsen

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States