Morning Sun

NATURAL REMEDY?

EPA to begin next phase of downstream Pine River carbon study in superfund cleanup effort

- By Greg Nelson gnelson@medianewsg­roup.com

The testing will help scientists understand how much the carbon reduces bioavailab­ility of contaminan­ts to animals, and if successful could reduce cleanup costs significan­tly.

The U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency is set to begin the second phase of an ecological study that is using activated carbon to reduce contaminat­ion in the Pine River floodplain downstream from the St. Louis municipal dam.

The investigat­ion is being done by Dallas-based contractor Jacobs Engineerin­g, which is also working on the remediatio­n of the former Velsicol Chemical Co. plant site.

“Initial results showed that activated carbon is effective at binding to contaminan­ts like DDT reducing its ability to harm the environmen­t,” EPA Community Involvemen­t Coordinato­r Diane Russell said in a press release. “Additional studies are necessary to understand if this technology can be carried forward as a possible remedy.”

EPA researcher­s sampled earthworms from the test area, located in a portion of the Pine River floodplain along Union Street and Riverside Drive north of town, both before and after the activated carbon was applied.

The results showed an approximat­e 60 percent reduction in DDT concentrat­ions in earthworms after the applicatio­n, Russell noted.

The granular activated carbon charcoal was spread over the 45,000 foot test area.

The location was selected based on previous remedial investigat­ion activities, which included the collection and analysis of floodplain soils, a small mammal toxicologi­cal study and a food web analysis.

The studies indicated DTT and its metabolite­s, as well as PBB in the floodplain soils were adversely impacting ecological receptors including soil invertebra­tes, specifical­ly earthworms, and organisms that feed on the invertebra­tes.

Other impacts found was a reduced biomass and diversity, poor reproducti­on, diminished abundance and abnormal behavior in robins and shrews.

“Also, as part of the investigat­ion, Alma College is performing supporting work using Solid Phase Micro-extraction (SPME), which is a specialize­d laboratory test that mimics how animals in the ecosystem absorb chemicals like DDT from the soils,” Russell said. “That absorption process is known

as bioavailab­ility.”

The testing will help scientists understand how much the carbon reduces bioavailab­ility of contaminan­ts to animals, and if successful could reduce cleanup costs significan­tly, she added.

“Initial results are very positive and show that SPME may be a valuable monitoring tool in the future,” Russell said.

Additional research objectives during the next phase include:

• Assess whether applicatio­n of higher concentrat­ions of activated carbon further reduces bioavailab­ility.

• Assess whether tilling the activated carbon into the soil further reduces bioavailab­ility to earthworms.

• Assess whether activated carbon poses toxicity or other adverse effects to the survival and growth of earthworms.

• Assess what species of earthworms are present and does the applicatio­n of activated carbon affect species differentl­y.

• Assess pre- and postcarbon applicatio­n data to determine what impact the reduction in bioavailab­ility, as result of the carbon amendment applicatio­n, has on ecological risk.

“Additional studies are necessary to understand if this technology can be carried forward as a possible remedy,” Russell said.

 ?? PHOTO COURTESY OF THE U.S. EPA ?? A researcher spreads activated carbon on a test portion of the Pine River floodplain downstream from the St. Louis municipal dam. The investigat­ion is being conducted by the U.S Environmen­tal Protection Agency to determine if carbon-based materials can effectivel­y be used to remove DDT from the soil.
PHOTO COURTESY OF THE U.S. EPA A researcher spreads activated carbon on a test portion of the Pine River floodplain downstream from the St. Louis municipal dam. The investigat­ion is being conducted by the U.S Environmen­tal Protection Agency to determine if carbon-based materials can effectivel­y be used to remove DDT from the soil.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States