Morning Sun

GOP should be nervous about the proposed third party. Democrats should be, too.

- Henry Olsen is a Washington Post columnist and a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

More than 100 Republican­s, including former officehold­ers and high-ranking staffers, reportedly plan to create a third party if the GOP doesn’t pull back from its embrace of former President Donald Trump. That should worry Republican­s — and Democrats, too.

These officials, who are expected to release a let- ter this week, broadly rep- resent a group that is a significan­t minority within the electorate. They tilt mildly to the right on economics, are generally centrist on matters of culture and do not highly prioritize concerns from the religious right even if they nominally support them. Not so long ago, they were an important, perhaps even the ruling, element in the GOP. They dominated Republican thinking during the George W. Bush administra­tion and battled the tea party and their religious right allies in the early 2010s.

The rise of Trump changed that. Trump’s victory in the

2016 GOP primary exposed this group’s lack of support among voters. Its preferred candidates — Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and John Kasich — were easily swept aside by Trump and tea party favorite Texas Sen. Ted Cruz. Many of these people rejected Trump from the start, refusing to endorse him and preferring to vote for Hillary Clinton or a thirdparty candidate. But Trump’s unexpected triumph sent them reeling even further.

Today, they find themselves out of power and out of step with the broader Republican electorate. Polls show Trump remains a popular figure among Republican­s. More importantl­y, many of the issue stances that these Republican­s planning to leave the party continue to tout, such as encouragin­g immigratio­n and global trade, are not shared by majorities of Republican voters. Republican dissidents may cite Trump’s character as their motivation for wanting to leave, but many are also closer on key policy issues to President Biden and his wing of the Democratic Party than they are to the GOP mainstream.

This is why any thirdparty effort would likely not attract many current Republican­s. Even Republican­s who share these views are deathly afraid of Democrats and their agenda. Third parties in the United States often attract higher levels of support early in a campaign only to lose most of those voters as they realize that their preferred candidate won’t win. There aren’t enough dissatisfi­ed, anti-trump Republican­s to mount credible challenges in safe GOP and winnable states and seats. Ambitious Republican politician­s and large donors want to be winners, not spoilers.

But winning may not be this effort’s goal. Even if this new party attracted only 3% to 5% of the total vote in the 2022 midterms, that small difference could be enough to make a difference. Ralph Nader’s quixotic Green Party campaign for president in 2000 only got 2.7 percent of the vote, yet his vote total exceeded George W. Bush’s winning margin in New Hampshire and Florida. Had Nader not been on the ballot, Vice President Al Gore likely would have won. A breakaway Constituti­onal Conservati­ve Party, to give the venture a name, could similarly determine which party controls the House and Senate.

That might perversely work to the GOP’S advantage. Democrats attracted the lion’s share of voters who fit this group’s issue stance and demographi­cs. Indeed, five of the eight people mentioned as potential signatorie­s on this letter publicly announced they would vote for Biden last year, and surely others followed George W. Bush’s example of writing in a candidate or voting for Libertaria­n nominee Jo Jorgensen. Such voters also backed Democrats in the key Arizona and Georgia Senate races and many House races. These people would surely be more comfortabl­e in this new party than in a Democratic Party that increasing­ly moves leftward on economics and culture. A new party that stands for the 2004era Bush Republican principles may draw more voters from Democratic ranks than from Republican­s.

This prospect should not, however, deter Republican leaders from trying to get these people back on board. The Republican Party cannot gain control of the federal government without attracting some people who did not vote for Trump. That includes expanding the party’s appeal with working-class nonwhites, but it also means getting some former Republican­s back in the GOP tent. A majority party in the United States is always a coalition, and that means the ardent Trump backers need to share space with those who think Trump made himself anathema on Jan. 6. That won’t be an easy coalition to form, but it’s an effort that must be made.

Ultimately, Republican­s threatenin­g to flee will need to decide which party tent they feel less comfortabl­e living in. Unless the demand for this new party exceeds anyone’s wildest expectatio­ns, they will have to decide whether they would rather coexist with the progressiv­e, woke left or the Trumpist, nativist right. Politics is not the “Hokey Pokey” where people can keep putting one step in a party and take another one out.

Third parties rarely get off the ground. We’ll see whose partisan house gets smashed if this effort really takes off.

 ??  ?? Henry Olsen
Henry Olsen

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States