New Haven Register (New Haven, CT)
Capitol defenders cite missed intelligence
WASHINGTON — Missed intelligence was to blame for the outmanned Capitol defenders’ failure to anticipate the violent mob that invaded the iconic building and halted certification of the presidential election on Jan. 6, the officials who were in charge of security that day said Tuesday in their first public testimony on the insurrection.
The officials, including the former chief of the Capitol Police, pointed their fingers at various federal agencies — and each other — for their failure to defend the building as supporters of then-President Donald Trump overwhelmed security barriers, broke windows and doors and sent lawmakers fleeing from the House and Senate chambers. Five people died as a result of the riot, including a Capitol Police officer and a woman who was shot as she tried to enter the House chamber with lawmakers still inside.
Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who resigned under pressure immediately after the attack, and the other officials said they had expected the protests to be similar to two pro-Trump events in late 2020 that were far less violent. Sund said he hadn’t seen an FBI field office report that warned of potential violence citing online posts about a “war.“
Sund described a scene as the mob arrived at the perimeter that was “like nothing” he had seen in his 30 years of policing and argued that the insurrection was not the result of poor planning
by Capitol Police but of failures across the board.
“No single civilian law enforcement agency — and certainly not the USCP — is trained and equipped to repel, without significant military or other law enforcement assistance, an insurrection of thousands of armed, violent and coordinated individuals focused on breaching a building at all costs,” he testified.
The hearing was the first of many examinations of what happened that day, coming almost seven weeks after the attack and over a week after the Senate voted to acquit Trump of inciting the insurrection by telling his supporters to “fight like hell” to overturn his election defeat. Fencing and National Guard troops still surround the Capitol in a wide perimeter, cutting off streets
and sidewalks that are normally full of cars, pedestrians and tourists.
The joint hearing, part of an investigation by two Senate committees, was the first time the officials testified publicly about the events of Jan. 6. In addition
to Sund, former Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger, former House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving and Robert Contee, the acting chief of police for the Metropolitan Police Department, testified.
Irving and Stenger also resigned under pressure immediately after the deadly attack. They were Sund’s supervisors and in charge of security for the House and Senate.
“We must have the facts, and the answers are in this room,“Senate Rules Committee Chairwoman Amy Klobuchar said at the beginning of the hearing. The Rules panel is conducting the joint probe with the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
Even after the hearing, much still remains unknown about what happened before and during the assault. How much did law enforcement agencies know about plans for violence that day, many of which were public? And how could the Capitol Police have been so ill-prepared for a violent insurrection that was organized online?
Sund told the lawmakers that he didn’t know then that his officers had received a report from the FBI’s field office in Norfolk, Va., that forecast, in detail, the chances that extremists could bring “war” to Washington the following day. The head of the FBI’s office in Washington has said that once he received the Jan. 5 warning, the information was quickly shared with other law enforcement agencies through a joint terrorism task force.
Sund said Tuesday that an officer on the task force had received that memo and forwarded it to a sergeant working on intelligence for the Capitol Police but that the information was not sent on to other supervisors.
“How could you not get that vital intelligence?” asked Senate Homeland Chairman Gary Peters, D-Mich., who said the failure of the report to reach the chief was clearly a major problem.
“That information would have been helpful,” Sund acknowledged.
Even without the intelligence, there were clear signs that violence was a possibility on Jan. 6. Farright social media users openly hinted for weeks that chaos would erupt at the U.S. Capitol while Congress convened to certify the election results.
Sund said he did see an intelligence report created within his own department warning that Congress could be targeted on Jan. 6. But he said that report assessed the probability of civil disobedience or arrests, based on the information they had, as “remote” to “improbable” for the groups expected to demonstrate.
Contee, the acting city police chief, also suggested that no one had flagged the FBI information from Norfolk, Virginia, which he said came in the form of an email. He said he would have expected that kind of intelligence “would warrant a phone call or something. ”
Sund and Irving disagreed on when the National Guard was called and on requests for the guard beforehand. Sund said he spoke to both Stenger and Irving about requesting the National Guard in the days before the riot, and that Irving said he was concerned about the “optics” of having them present. Irving denied that, saying Sund’s account was “categorically false.“
The old U.S. Navy design acronym, K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid) has proven to have countless applications in civilian life. Whether discussing home or web design, car repair, teaching or coaching, there are reliable benefits to embracing the straightest paths. It also continues to apply to military applications.
There’s wisdom to approaching the COVID-19 pandemic as an enemy that requires a military strategy. In many ways, America’s failures in addressing the coronavirus have been a consequence of a lack of discipline, a stubbornness to maintaining basic protocols such as social distancing, wearing masks and washing hands. Simple strategies.
We tilt toward another military acronym in contemplating a plan of action for the next stage of vaccine distribution. The government is essentially a MASH (Mobile Army Surgical Hospital) unit and everyone is a patient. For, in the end, we have all been wounded by the pandemic, and no one should be denied treatment.
Like a field surgeon, the state’s brass has to make tough decisions. That was already clear after the first doses were distributed to health workers. Pressure was put on Gov. Ned Lamont’s office on who would get priority for the second phase, notably from educators.
Lamont responded Monday by citing the K.I.S.S. principle as he tossed out his existing playbook. Starting Monday, March 1, residents aged 55-65 will become eligible, followed by the 45-54 age group on March 22, the 25-44 group April 12 and the 16-34 group May 3.
Teachers, school staff and professional child care providers will also be guided to dedicated clinics starting March 1. Simple, right? It’s too simple. Lamont has chosen to go rogue from the guidance provided by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as state advisory groups. He decided other states got in trouble when they tried to “finely slice the sausage.” Civil wars are already brewing between various unions and civil rights groups questioning Lamont’s decision to form lines based on age.
We can appreciate the challenges of distinguishing big box store employees from supermarket workers, but the state has strayed from the mission by not addressing people with preexisting conditions.
Dr. Gregory Buller, associate chief medical officer at Bridgeport Hospital, explains that having, for example, smoking among the COVID risk factors would complicate any process to shuffle people with conditions into the line.
Stamford Hospital Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Michael Parry said it’s simply a matter of “operational expediency” at the clinics.
In other words, it’s just simpler. That may work in terms of efficiency, but it will put lives at risk. Yes, asking for proof of comorbidities from people with compromised immune systems, sickle cell disease, cancer and other conditions that put them at risk could make the line move more slowly.
But people with conditions such as these should not be left waiting on the COVID battlefield. A lot of things just aren’t simple. Among them is saving lives.
The state has strayed from the mission by not addressing people with preexisting conditions.