Project doesn’t have to be OK’d

An article in your paper that appeared on March 21 says the Milford Planning and Zoning Board seems to be headed toward “reluctantly” approving the apartment/office complex at 67 Prospect St. The project had received approval from numerous agencies but no one seemed enthusiastic about it.

Why must they “reluctantly” approve this project? This is because “their hands are tied.” I have heard this same excuse several times before. I must ask, “Why are their hand tied?” “Who tied them?”

Prospect Street was quietly put into the Milford Center Design District (MCDD) several years ago when the Plan of Conservation and Development was adopted. This allowed for commercial development on this onceresidential street.

I and many others have asked repeatedly that Prospect Street be removed from the MCDD. This has fallen upon deaf ears. I was allowed several years ago to make a presentation before the board. I pointed out that Prospect Street is part of the River Park National Register Historic District. Other parts of the MCDD are within a local historic district.

The board listened respectfully to my presentation, thanked me for it and then did nothing.

The Planning and Zoning Board has had ample opportunity to untie its hands. It appears that we of the historic preservation community have finally gotten their attention because of a public outcry; 67 Prospect St. is part of the original home lot of the Rev. Peter Prudden, leader of the founding of Milford in 1639 and first pastor of the First Church. But, according to the board, it’s now too late. The project must be approved.

Prospect Street was easily put into the MCDD. I’m sure that the Planning and Zoning Board can take it out if they have the will.

Richard N. Platt Jr. Former city historian, Milford