New York Daily News

A dirty deal for cleaners

- ALBOR RUIZ albor.ruiz@aol.com

It was music to their ears when the 150 people who clean the New York office of WeWork, a shared-office-space provider, were told they could reapply for the jobs they were about to lose. But the news turned out to be not that great after all.

The workers’ employer, Commercial Building Maintenanc­e, ended its contract with the Manhattan-based company barely a week after the employees demanded better wages. Their last day will be Sunday.

WeWork decided not to use contractor­s any longer, but to hire workers directly. The $10 billion company invited the Commercial Building employees, some of whom have been cleaning their offices for more than a year, to fill out job applicatio­ns.

WeWork President Artie Minson made it clear in a blog post that the new positions — now called “community service associates” and “community service leads” — entail greater responsibi­lities. This could mean that some laid-off cleaners would not be rehired.

“While these new positions are much broader than the cleaning services we have been contractin­g with CBM for, we will be interviewi­ng all CBM employees and we expect that a number of the current CBM employees will meet the qualificat­ions,” Minson wrote.

Commercial Building, a nonunion company, pays its employees a miserable $10 an hour — about half the wages unionized janitors make — but WeWork has said the rehired workers will be paid $15 plus health care, a 401(k) plan and stock options.

Although the new offer is a much better deal, the salary is still below what unionized janitors make. Also, the workers, most of whom are Latino immigrants, fear it sets some unfair barriers, like the new “ability to communicat­e in English” requiremen­t.

“What is that, exactly?” said Alejandrin­a Marte, 56. “Speaking is not part of my job. I work with my hands, and so far I haven’t had any complaints. Many of us do not know English, but we do a good job.”

Marte was part of a group of 10 workers who, accompanie­d by state Sen. Brad Hoylman (D-Manhattan) went to the WeWork offices on Wednesday to turn in their job applicatio­ns in person. Despite Hoylman’s presence, security guards turned them back at the door.

“They said we needed an appointmen­t,” Marte said. “I felt they didn’t care about us.”

Another concern is that WeWork has said it will hire only 100 workers.

“The company is expanding . . . and we hope the English requiremen­t is not used as a pretext to not hire some workers,” said Rachel Cohen, an organizer for Service Employees Internatio­nal Union Local 32BJ, which has been helping the workers articulate their demands. “We think all of the workers should be able to keep their jobs, to unionize and to be paid the prevailing wage of $18 an hour.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States