New York Daily News

A pipeline, people and the planet

- BY KARENNA GORE Gore is director of the Center for Earth Ethics at Union Theologica­l Seminary.

Americans face a big decision on Nov. 8. But another high-stakes battle over our future is taking place closer to home. Twentyfive miles north of the city, a private company is trying to force a high-pressure fracked-gas pipeline beside the Indian Point nuclear power plant and under the Hudson River. This fossil-fuel project would harm our climate and present the immediate threat of an accident that could contaminat­e our air, soil and water.

The Algonquin Incrementa­l Market Expansion — or AIM project — consists of 37 miles of new pipeline and six compressor stations designed to push gas fracked from the shale fields of Pennsylvan­ia through New York, New England and on to Canada for possible export. It was conceived by Spectra, a Texasbased corporatio­n recently absorbed by Enbridge, a Canadian multinatio­nal (and owner of $1.5 billion stake in the Dakota Access Pipeline).

Spectra was granted eminent domain power by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, an agency notorious for rubber-stamping projects for the industry. Despite community outcry and trouble getting the pipe under the river, Spectra still plans to turn on the gas next Tuesday.

This is terribly risky. Indian Point sits near two earthquake fault lines and stores 40 years of highly radioactiv­e spent fuel rods. If the AIM pipeline ruptures — and the number of accidents on U.S. gas transmissi­on pipelines (143 in 2015) indicates that is a real possibilit­y — the ensuing radioactiv­e release could impact up to a 50-mile radius, where 20 million people live.

According to nuclear engineer Paul Blanch, the approval process for AIM was inherently flawed and did not take into account the nature of high-pressure fracked-gas pipelines. He and other experts warn that an accident at the intersecti­on of AIM and Indian Point would be far worse than the Fukushima disaster in Japan in 2011, which resulted in the evacuation of tens of thousands of people.

Elected officials have taken notice, but not enough to make a difference. In February, Gov. Cuomo called for a halt to constructi­on while the state conducted an independen­t risk assessment. In August, New York Sens. Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand asked for a halt and an independen­t review of health, safety and environmen­tal impacts.

Massachuse­tts Sens. Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren have written the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) about clear conflicts of interest in its approval process, and the City of Boston is among those suing the project.

But FERC is designed to respond to the industry rather than the public trust.

If the placement of this pipeline is puzzling, so is the timing. A study released last month by Oil Change Internatio­nal found that if we do not accelerate the transition to renewable energy sources, we will face catastroph­ic climate change. At the very least, this means flooding of coastal cities like New York, extreme weather and more refugees and strife as people flee places that have become uninhabita­ble.

Although commonly called natural gas, the fuel that would flow in this pipeline is more properly called methane. When burned, it has half the carbon emissions of coal. But that is still too much carbon at a time when the atmosphere has just passed the threshold of 400 parts per million. Scientists have determined that when methane leaks or is released from gas operations, which is common, it is 84 times more heat-trapping over a 20-year period than carbon dioxide.

The threats to our health, safety and planet don’t end there. New York City water sources are located 12.4 miles from Indian Point. As the Standing Rock Sioux say, “Water is life.” Why would we endanger a common source of this most basic human need?

We should not accept this high threshold of danger at the vulnerable Indian Point power station. We should not let a foreign company profit from tearing up the Hudson riverbed and putting New Yorkers at risk.

We should build a bridge to tomorrow’s economy, not to yesterday’s. President Obama must intervene with his administra­tion’s energy regulatory commission and halt constructi­on of this dangerous fossil fuel pipeline now.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States