New York Daily News

Trump’s words must have consequenc­es

- BY CHRIS EDELSON Edelson is an assistant professor of government in American University’s School of Public Affairs.

Two weeks ago, President Trump leveled an extraordin­ary charge against President Barack Obama, claiming that his predecesso­r tapped phones in Trump Tower before the election. The President cited no evidence to support his claim, and reporting suggested Trump had developed the theory based only on speculativ­e commentary published by Breitbart News.

For the past two weeks, we’ve watched as Trump and his administra­tion have dug in deeper, refusing to back down from the claim while also suggesting that British intelligen­ce could have helped Obama listen in on Trump’s calls.

That led to a diplomatic row with one of the United States’ closest allies, as British intelligen­ce agency GCHQ took the rare step of issuing a public statement to dismiss the Trump administra­tion’s claims as “nonsense” that “should be ignored.”

For a while, it wasn’t clear how this matter would be resolved. Some objective observer needed to weigh in and explain what had really happened.

During congressio­nal testimony Monday before a House of Representa­tives committee, two such observers weighed in. FBI Director James Comey and National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers made clear that there is absolutely no evidence to support Trump’s wild claims. Comey testified that “The FBI and the Justice Department have no informatio­n to support” Trump’s accusation against Obama. Rogers — on behalf of the National Security Agency — seconded what Comey said.

As for the suggestion British intelligen­ce could have helped wiretap Obama, Rogers strongly dismissed the notion that this could have occurred, explaining that such action would be “expressly against the construct of the Five Eyes agreement that’s been in place for decades.”

“Five Eyes” is a partnershi­p of the United States, Britain, Canada, New Zealand and Australia that provides for intelligen­ce sharing among the countries.

This is important stuff. Trump and his administra­tion made serious allegation­s against both his predecesso­r in office and a close American ally. He and his administra­tion offered no evidence to support these claims, and U.S. intelligen­ce officials have now flatly debunked them.

It is understand­able that many of us would prefer to move on from this uncomforta­ble episode, trying our best to put this all in the rearview mirror. That would be a mistake. If Trump gets the message that he can make prepostero­us claims with impunity, he will have every reason to do so again.

Such claims can be very damaging. Rogers testified that the allegation the Trump administra­tion made was not helpful to the relationsh­ip between the United States and the United Kingdom.

Rogers similarly testified that Trump’s suggestion, during a public meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, that he and Merkel shared something in common, as each had supposedly been wiretapped by Obama, “certainly complicate­s things.”

Take a moment to let this sink in. The NSA director testified that the U.S. President has taken action at odds with some of our closest internatio­nal alliances. If Trump reported to Rogers, it would be difficult to imagine that Rogers could have any confidence in Trump. Of course, Trump does not report to Rogers. But under our constituti­onal democracy, the President is neither above the law nor beyond reproach.

With Republican­s controllin­g the House and Senate, it is up to them to decide whether there will be any consequenc­es for Trump’s reckless actions.

Comey testified that the FBI’s investigat­ion of links and possible cooperatio­n between the Trump campaign and Russia is ongoing, and that he can’t know when it will conclude. We don’t know, of course, what that investigat­ion will or won’t turn up.

But we already know enough, based on Monday’s public testimony, to tell us that our government is facing an urgent challenge defined by a President who has shown no compunctio­n about defaming his predecesso­r and jeopardizi­ng longstandi­ng American alliances.

It is hard to imagine a more difficult or unpleasant task for Republican­s: to determine whether they are confident that the President is fit to carry out the duties of his office. No one can take any pleasure in this, but if Republican­s in Congress do nothing, they will be making a dangerous mistake.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States