New York Daily News

Unite to crack open shell corporatio­ns

- BY CAROLYN MALONEY AND PETER KING Maloney, a Democrat, and King, a Republican, represent New York in the House of Representa­tives.

This summer, the U.S. Justice Department won a long battle against banks affiliated with the government of Iran that secretly violated economic sanctions by purchasing property in New York City.

It is difficult to imagine: A rogue nation chose to evade sanctions not by hiding money in North Korea or China or Russia but in the United States. And they did so in our home state of New York.

After looking further into how this could happen, we discovered that the scheme was made possible through the use of anonymous shell companies that disguise the identity of those behind the deal from the sellers, law enforcemen­t and those charged with protecting our homeland security.

The Iranians were not the first nor will they be the last to use anonymous companies to launder proceeds of illicit activities. Human trafficker­s, drug cartels, corrupt foreign officials, illegal arms dealers and numerous fraudsters — who steal from taxpayers and endanger our troops — all are using anonymous companies.

Our colleague and chairman of the House subcommitt­ee on terrorism and illicit finance, Steve Pearce, remarked in a recent hearing that drug cartels using anonymousl­y owned trucking companies in New Mexico are “weakening the economic framework by which other companies can be successful” and that they “drain resources” that could be used to create work opportunit­ies.

U.S. financial institutio­ns spend an estimated $8 billion each year on anti-money-laundering efforts. While we passed additional anti-money-laundering rules after the Sept. 11 attacks, such as requiring financial institutio­ns to know their customers, we have not provided law enforcemen­t or financial institutio­ns one of the basic tools to effectivel­y stop the next Iran — or Iran itself — from again hiding money in our country.

In other words, we haven’t required these anonymous shell companies to no longer be anonymous. As a result, anti-moneylaund­ering experts estimate we fail to seize dirty money 99.9% of the time. One financial crimes expert has noted that we are a decimal point away from complete failure.

It is time we took a fresh look at how to address the problem. The new administra­tion has said it wants to prioritize efforts to counter terrorism and domestic crime. We say, “Follow the money.” That is why we recently introduced the bipartisan Corporate Transparen­cy Act of 2017.

The bill asks companies to name the true owners — also known as “beneficial owners” — at their time of incorporat­ion. This is a relatively simple yet effective approach that has garnered an impressive array of support.

Financial institutio­ns, large and small, have come out in support of the bill because it will help them protect their businesses from being used to launder money. Small businesses, frustrated with losing out on contracts to con artists, have added their support. Police, prosecutor­s and those fighting human traffickin­g all signed on.

Veterans outraged by what they saw during their service — scammers diverting billions of defense dollars to corrupt foreign officials or, worse, our enemies who seek to do us harm — are onboard as well. One report found U.S. funds were paid to anonymous companies secretly owned by the Taliban. This must stop.

Many CEOs of large businesses also understand the benefits of transparen­cy and the importance of combating the disruption caused by anonymous companies. In a recent letter addressed to us, several business leaders wrote, “When the true owners of companies put their own name on corporate formation papers, it increases integrity in the system and provides a higher level of confidence when managing risk, developing supply chains and allocating capital.”

The growing recognitio­n of the dangers of anonymous companies offers us an opportunit­y to effectivel­y respond. After years of mounting examples, we now have a clear record of the threats and the damage caused. We look forward to working with our colleagues to end the use of anonymous companies to shield illicit finance that poses a risk to our national security and undermines our economy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States