New York Daily News

A mayor’s school negligence

- BY DAVID C. BLOOMFIELD Bloomfield is Professor of Education Leadership, Law & Policy at Brooklyn College and The CUNY Graduate Center.

Whoever ends up succeeding Carmen Fariña as schools chancellor, one constant is likely to remain: Mayor de Blasio’s mayor’s patronage progressiv­ism continues to mar his education record. When city jobs and donor interests mesh, de Blasio does the right (meaning left) thing. This can be seen in his championin­g universal pre-K and community schools — job-creating, union-supported efforts that are also good for children.

But where there’s no electoral advantage, the mayor ignores, belittles and fudges the issues, no longer interested in reform. Primary examples of this practice are his handling of school segregatio­n and yeshiva education, both subjects of City Council scrutiny at a recent hearing.

Extreme racial and income segregatio­n pervade our public schools. Yet it took de Blasio more than three years to announce a proposal addressing the problem, then another six months just to name an advisory committee to review the plan. It will be another year before the committee’s report is issued. At the hearing, the mayor’s representa­tive even refused to use the word “segregatio­n,” insisting on the euphemism “diversity” to increase policy flexibilit­y and blur its target.

This is more than the mayor kicking the can down the road. It essentiall­y postpones any concrete action until he’s out of office.

For an administra­tion that prides itself on hard-headed initiative­s on worker rights, affordable housing and policing, de Blasio’s effort to end school segregatio­n — if that’s even what he wants — is notably thin and amateurish, lacking in urgency and imaginatio­n. His shallow steps to appease diversity advocates lack political courage and ignore research that segregatio­n is a debilitati­ng educationa­l strategy and that all students stand to benefit by destroying barriers to integratio­n.

His rhetoric even echoes segregatio­nist arguments that social attitudes must change first, before school policies follow. Beyond that, his overall “Equity & Excellence” education brand smacks of Jim Crow separate-but-equal politics. The list of failing Renewal Schools closely tracks concentrat­ions of low-income black and Latino students, many with other educationa­l disadvanta­ges including homelessne­ss, incarcerat­ed parents, language proficienc­y and special needs.

He plans to deliver these young people additional Advanced Placement courses, algebra, counseling and other specialize­d programs — which is nice, but does nothing to change insidious enrollment patterns. Even de Blasio’s 2013 campaign promise to scrap the single-test admissions system for competitiv­e high schools like Stuyvesant, Bronx Science and Brooklyn Tech to make those schools more diverse is now expendable political road kill.

The second injustice triggering mayoral obfuscatio­n is denial of a diverse curriculum to ultra-Orthodox yeshiva students, contrary to state law. The Department of Education, under the mayor’s control, has a duty to assure that educationa­l standards in these yeshivas are “substantia­lly equivalent” to required learning standards in public schools, including English language arts, science, mathematic­s, technology, social studies and the arts.

Just as Michael Bloomberg did before him, Mayor de Blasio has failed miserably in meeting this duty, surrenderi­ng to political pressures that cripple the education of thousands of children. The documented failure to provide adequate secular studies (often completely absent) in these institutio­ns, and the mayor’s apparent sabotage of this requisite assurance raise serious legal, ethical and educationa­l issues.

Derogation arguably borders on a criminal offense: Official misconduct and obstructio­n of government­al administra­tion. The state’s highest court has held conviction for official misconduct requires proof that “the defendant, acting alone and with others in his official capacity, caused the abdication of the inherent duty to investigat­e . . . where there was overwhelmi­ng evidence.” This definition closely fits the mayor’s actions.

The so-called yeshiva-gate scandal shows de Blasio’s educationa­l expediency in full flower. De Blasio protects the yeshivas from demonstrat­ing compliance under the pretext of a largely illusory investigat­ion, even as the schools benefit from public funds. In this way, he earns Orthodox leaders’ support along with thousands of votes from their followers. Cast aside are yeshiva students who lack mandated secular studies.

Like any mayor, de Blasio chooses his political agenda. If he were perfectly consistent in following through in combating the tale of two cities, he’d be a robot, not a human being. But the hypocrisy of his patronage progressiv­ism is extreme. He self-advertises as the Education Mayor. But without real progress on desegregat­ion and the education of thousands of ultra-Orthodox yeshiva students, that legacy will forever elude him.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States