New York Daily News

Lawyer accused of plotting to free guilty scum

- BY JOSEPH NEFF Attorney Scott Brettschne­ider (main photo) and “pseudo legal assistant” Charles Gallman (above) allegedly have no qualms about bribing witnesses.

A VETERAN Queens lawyer nicknamed Mighty Whitey drummed up a mighty sinister scheme to subvert the criminal justice system and make millions in the process, authoritie­s allege.

Scott Brettschne­ider plotted to pay a murder witness to recant his trial testimony as part of an audacious scam to free a convicted killer and rake in big bucks from a wrongful conviction suit, prosecutor­s say.

The scheme apparently fizzled out — but the very prospect that a plan like that could work troubles advocates who help the wrongfully convicted in their quest for freedom and compensati­on.

“This could be so damaging,” said Jon Eldan, the director of After Innocence, a reentry and advocacy program for those wrongfully convicted of a crime.

Brettschne­ider, 61, was arrested in March on unrelated charges: filing fake drug treatment records in a bid to spring a client from prison early. He has entered a plea of not guilty and is free on half-amillion-dollars bond.

In a letter to the judge requesting a high bond, Brooklyn federal prosecutor­s outlined the alleged bogus exoneratio­n scheme.

Prosecutor­s say the attorney conspired with Charles Gallman, a “pseudo legal assistant” with a rap sheet that includes murder and robbery.

The feds say Gallman, 56, also has a history of bribing and intimidati­ng witnesses for Brettschne­ider and other lawyers. Gallman and others are heard on wiretaps referring to the lawyer as “Mighty Whitey.”

The two men were caught on a wiretap in December 2014 strategizi­ng about landing the convicted murderer as a client, according to court papers.

“Scott, we gotta get this guy,” Gallman said of the unidentifi­ed inmate.

Brettschne­ider agreed. absolutely,” he replied.

Gallman laid out a plan: go to the trial witness who identified the shooter and get a statement about police coercion.

Gallman even previewed a possible statement. The “police told him to lie, he better say it’s this guy else they’re gonna lock him up.”

A second factor was critical to landing the client: Gallman and Brettschne­ider would own the recantatio­n, forcing the convicted murderer to hire their firm.

“We got the statement,” Gallman said. “He don’t want us to “Oh, do the s--t then I am keeping the statement.”

“Oh, absolutely,” Brettschne­ider.

Brettschne­ider, who has taken more than 200 trials to verdict and has worked on at least two highprofil­e wrongful conviction cases, described the case as a “slam dunk” and “home run” on wiretaps.

Gallman was elated at the prospect of flooding the Queens district attorney’s office with innocence cases, prosecutor­s said. He and Brettschne­ider envisioned multimilli­on-dollar settlement­s and early retirement­s.

“The two men started dreaming about how many millions of dollars the civil case would bring,” prosecutor­s wrote in a letter to the judge.

“Brettschne­ider thought they could get a third of $22 million, agreeing with Gallman that it could be their ‘retirement money.’ ”

But first they needed the witness to recant.

In the following days, detectives saw Brettschne­ider pick up Gallman in his car — and then the witness.

Later, wiretaps picked up Gallman replied delivering a rave review of how the witness lied through his teeth in rehearsal: “The best recantatio­n I ever heard.”

“We got this money, Man, we got this,” Gallman added. But an obstacle soon surfaced. The witness balked at committing his story to paper until he was paid upfront. He didn’t want to be “waiting waiting waiting” for years while a lawsuit worked its way through the courts. Gallman promised some cash in the coming months, but acknowledg­ed that the six-figure payoff would take time.

“The money don’t come till the lawsuit, but we trying to get some upfront money,” Gallman said.

“I plan all of us having six seven hundred thousand dollars out this s--t, Man.”

Prosecutor­s did not say how far Brettschne­ider and Gallman advanced the scheme, if at all.

The Brooklyn U.S. attorney’s office declined to comment. Neither Brettschne­ider nor his lawyer returned requests for comment.

The feds say in their letter that Brettschne­ider will “almost certainly be disbarred” as a result of the case.

A retired NYPD detective, after learning the details of the case, was so shocked he shouted an expletive.

“Get the f--k out of here. You can't make this up,” the 25-year vet added. “He’s never going to be able to practice law.”

Gallman, who was also indicted and pleaded not guilty in the fake drug treatment records case, remains behind bars at the Metropolit­an Correction­al Center in lower Manhattan. His lawyer did not respond to requests for comment.

Rodney Ellis, a former Texas lawmaker who championed laws for the wrongfully convicted, said the allegation­s were both deeply troubling and rare. He said he’s never heard of a similar case.

“Any attempt to cheat the system is unlikely to be successful given the very high threshold for proving actual innocence or winning a civil rights lawsuit,” Ellis said. “Focus should remain on what is all too common in our criminal justice system: wrongful conviction­s.”

This story was published in partnershi­p with the Marshall Project, a nonprofit news organizati­on covering the U.S. criminal justice system.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States