New York Daily News

City settles with tox doc

- BY STEPHEN REX BROWN

A prominent toxicologi­st who lost her job after calling for more transparen­cy about a controvers­ial form of DNA testing won a $1 million settlement from the city on Monday.

Marina Stajic (photo) said she was fired April 9, 2015, because she voted in favor of publicly releasing an internal Office of Chief Medical Examiner study on “low copy number” DNA testing, which analyzes small amounts of genetic material. Critics have said the form of DNA testing — which the city has since abandoned — may have led to wrongful conviction­s.

“My votes on the Forensic Science Commission were in favor of the principle of scientific transparen­cy, which I have stood for my entire career. No government employee should lose a job for standing up for honesty and sound science, but this was particular­ly hurtful for me because I had devoted nearly my entire career to serving the people of New York City and New York State,” said Stajic, 69.

“I hope that the settlement sends a message to OCME employees that they should speak up when they see something wrong, and that it is possible to fight back against unlawful retaliatio­n.”

The case was to go to trial in Manhattan Federal Court next month. Emails uncovered through the lawsuit showed that Stajic, who worked as the city’s toxicology lab director for 29 years, infuriated colleagues with her vote.

“She sucks,” OCME special counsel at the time, Mimi Mairs, wrote.

“Hold me down,” Chief Medical Examiner Barbara Sampson wrote, indicating she needed to be restrained.

Stajic’s attorneys Kevin Mintzer and Daniel Alterman said they’d obtained OCME records that showed the agency did not have the proper research verifying a specific type of “low copy” testing that involves an especially small DNA sample obtained from a mixture of genetic material from more than two people.

“The chief medical examiner’s decision was justified and appropriat­e. However, based upon our legal assessment of the case, we determined that a settlement was in the best interest of the city,” a Law Department spokesman said.

A spokeswoma­n for the medical examiner’s office said the agency stood behind its science.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States