New York Daily News

Lawyers for Kelly: Rap won’t ‘Fly’

- BY LARRY MCSHANE

Defense attorneys believe the government’s racketeeri­ng charge against chart-topping singer R. Kelly lacks something: co-conspirato­rs.

Attorneys for the “I Believe I Can Fly” singer, in Brooklyn Federal Court papers filed Friday, asserted the top count in the five-count indictment against Kelly failed to even identify the other players in the disgraced R&B star’s alleged racketeeri­ng operation.

“The supersedin­g indictment is silent on how any other individual benefited from Mr. Kelly engaging in sexual activity,” said defense attorney Steven Greenberg in calling for a dismissal of the charge. “If no others benefit, then the only member of the enterprise is Mr. Kelly.”

The indictment also accused Kelly (inset) of employing underlings for the “recruiting and grooming” of sexual partners for their boss. But Greenberg noted that none of the alleged subservien­t defendants were ever identified by prosecutor­s.

The federal racketeeri­ng law “was not designed as a means to punish a single individual for his own wrongful actions,” argued Greenberg in his 11-page filing. “The government would like the court to believe that an individual, namely Mr. Kelly, and unnamed, unidentifi­ed associates somehow formed a … [racketeree­ing] enterprise.”

The accused predatory pedophile stands accused of improper sexual activity with three girls under the age of 18, concealing informatio­n from sexual partners that he had a sexuallytr­ansmitted disease, and producing child pornograph­y.

In all, five Jane Does were cited as targets of Kelly’s criminal sexual behavior in the New York charges.

Kelly, currently in federal lockup without bail, also faces federal charges in Chicago for producing and receiving child pornograph­y, and for inducing minors to engage in sexual activity. An email for comment from Brooklyn Federal prosecutor­s was not returned.

Greenberg, in court papers, also noted that prosecutor­s alleged the sick conspiracy was going on for some 23 years.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States