New York Daily News

THE BADGE IS NO LONGER A SHIELD

The long road to ending cop secrecy law

- BY LEONARD GREENE

Critics of rule 50-a probably had about 50 good reasons for wanting to repeal the law shielding police disciplina­ry records from public view, but nothing got rid of the measure quicker than the ugly death of George Floyd.

After years and years of calls for transparen­cy, and case after case of brutal and deadly misconduct, it took the last-straw death of Floyd, under the knee of a Minneapoli­s police officer, for New York legislator­s to finally come around.

“Every parent, every mother who looks like me understood that scary notion with our kids, with our husbands, with our brothers,” said state Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins,

who stood with Gov. Cuomo Friday as he signed the new “Say Their Names” law.

“We are at a moment of reckoning,” Stewart-Cousins (D-Westcheste­r) said. “There is no doubt about it.”

To emphasize her point, StewartCou­sins and Cuomo were joined by Valerie Bell, the mother of Sean Bell, who was killed by cops in Queens in 2006, and Gwen Carr, the mother of Eric Garner, who was killed by police on Staten Island in 2014.

Eliminatin­g the law, known as Section 50-a, makes complaints against officers, as well as transcript­s and final dispositio­ns of disciplina­ry proceeding­s, public for the first time in decades.

And the state’s approximat­ely 500 police department­s will all have to develop plans to address everything from use of force to implicit bias awareness training by next April under an executive order.

The governor said New York is the first to come up with such a plan and warned that police department­s that fail to comply will not receive state aid.

In 1976, legislator­s passed the provision, known as 50-a of New York’s Civil Rights Law, as a way to protect police officers who testified in court.

“All personnel records used to evaluate performanc­e toward continued employment or promotion, under the control of any police agency or department of the state … shall be considered confidenti­al and not subject to inspection or review without the express written consent of such police officer, firefighte­r, firefighte­r/ paramedic, correction officer or peace officer …. except as may be mandated by lawful court order,” the provision states.

But criminal justice advocates and public defenders have sought to overturn the provision, arguing that it removes a crucial layer of transparen­cy for police officers accused of misconduct and gives police department­s even more power than they already have.

“The repeal of 50-a is a critical step toward justice for New Yorkers, especially black and brown New Yorkers who have historical­ly been the main targets of police abuse,” said Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union. “The repeal will make it harder for police department­s to cover up abuse and to look the other way when

officers engage in gross misconduct.”

And while the NYPD appears to be onboard with the changes, the union that represents rank-and-file cops blasted what it describes as “antipolice measures.”

“The NYPD has long-advocated for the reform of 50-a and the need for greater transparen­cy while also balancing officer safety,” said Sgt. Jessica McRorie, an NYPD spokeswoma­n. “We will review the final version of the legislatio­n and utilize it in a manner that ensures greater transparen­cy and fairness.”

But Police Benevolent Associatio­n President Patrick Lynch said the repeal of 50-a will make it harder for cops to do their jobs, and will put them at greater risk.

“New York State had been failing our communitie­s for decades: failing to provide economic opportunit­y, failing to educate our youth, failing to care for the vulnerable and the mentally ill,” Lynch said.

“Police officers spend our days addressing issues caused by these failures. Now, we won’t even be able to do that. We will be permanentl­y frozen, stripped of all resources and unable to do the job. We don’t want to see our communitie­s suffer, but this is what Gov. Cuomo and our elected leaders have chosen.”

But the momentum and public sentiment has shifted the other way, and for that Lynch can thank officers like Derek Chauvin — the white cop who was fired and charged with the murder of Floyd. Chauvin pressed his knee into the handcuffed black man’s for more than eight minutes during a Memorial Day arrest.

His last words, caught on camera for the world to hear, were, “I can’t breathe.”

They were also the last words of Garner, whose mother made a crusade of the effort to repeal 50-a during last year’s department­al trial of former NYPD Officer Daniel Pantaleo, who applied the banned chokehold that led to Garner’s death.

Pantaleo was fired after the trial, but several other officers involved in the deadly arrest remain with the department.

In the absence of true justice for her son, the still-grieving mother has sought some measure of accountabi­lity, and with the stroke of a pen, in the wake of yet another unspeakabl­e death, she finally got it.

“It was a long time coming,“Carr said. “But it came.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? With the Rev. Al Sharpton, Hazel Dukes, Valerie Bell, Gwen Carr and Andrea Stewart-Cousins (left to right) looking on, Gov . Cuomo signs law ending privacy protection­s for police misconduct. The move comes years after former cop Daniel Pantaleo (above) took down Eric Garner (right). The recent police-custody death of George Floyd (far right) gave the measure new momentum, despite pushback from police union boss Patrick Lynch (below).
With the Rev. Al Sharpton, Hazel Dukes, Valerie Bell, Gwen Carr and Andrea Stewart-Cousins (left to right) looking on, Gov . Cuomo signs law ending privacy protection­s for police misconduct. The move comes years after former cop Daniel Pantaleo (above) took down Eric Garner (right). The recent police-custody death of George Floyd (far right) gave the measure new momentum, despite pushback from police union boss Patrick Lynch (below).
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States