New York Daily News

The de Blasio reopening debacle

- HARRY SIEGEL harrysiege­l@gmail.com

W ith infection and death rates soaring, bodies stacking up faster than they could be buried and public hospitals overflowin­g even as armories, gyms and Manhattan’s first homeless shelter were converted into sick bays, the city’s health commission­er made a bold decision: Schools would stay open.

So as Los Angeles closed its system for an “enforced vacation” and attendance in Chicago plummeted, students in New York went to school as usual, with classes kept separate from each other.

They are “better off in school, under supervisio­n, than playing about in the streets,” the commission­er explained, while his 8-year-old son was stricken with the virus.

Adults need to feed their families and their kids need to be in the modern and sanitary conditions the city can provide, he said, “under the constant guardiansh­ip of the medical inspectors” with school physicians checking students each morning and sending sick ones home where school nurses and Health Department inspectors visited them.

The nation’s biggest, densest city — which also kept businesses including movie theaters open on staggered schedules — stayed the course and saw its way through a plague that killed 675,000 Americans with a much lower death rate than other big cities. It was perhaps the culminatin­g triumph of the progressiv­e era that saw education regimented, systematiz­ed and prioritize­d, with vast resources poured into modern new buildings with good ventilatio­n as urban enrollment soared.

That’s no fairy tale of New York, but what happened when the “Spanish flu” hit in 1918 and Health Commission­er Royal S. Copeland, backed by Mayor John Hyland, rose to the occasion — two Tammany Hall regulars stepping up to see the city through one of the city’s darkest hours.

That’s a stark contrast to Bill de Blasio’s debacle in 2020, with an overwhelme­d and unimaginat­ive mayor wresting control from his Health Department while prioritizi­ng message control over mission control. Friday, de Blasio insisted that reopening schools was a “greater challenge than anyone foresaw,” which any principal could tell you is a flat-out lie.

The truth is that the mayor and his second-choice, second-rate schools chancellor — who’s shown more public passion for challengin­g the admissions standards at a handful of elite public high schools than he has for reopening the full system — failed to meet the moment, shaking the confidence of parents, principals and teachers in Tweed’s ability to fulfill the basic mission of the public schools.

Our “leaders” have passively overseen this self-inflicted disaster, after de Blasio vowed to make New York the only big city school system in America to physically reopen for the start of the school year.

But the mayor and his chancellor offloaded the actual work, with no real guidance or support, to principals — many of whom found out Thursday morning that the first day back in school, which had already been pushed back to Monday, was being pushed back again. Insult to injury, they found out not from the city but from New York Times education reporter Eliza Shapiro, who broke the news just ahead of de Blasio’s public announceme­nt.

A century ago, the curve was fattening when Copeland made the call to keep schools open and as he held to it. De Blasio broke his reopening promise even as the virus is, for now, under control here. In the 180 days between when he closed the schools and when he’d originally said that they would reopen, the mayor did almost nothing to envision new models or deal with existing problems like the poor ventilatio­n inside many of the modern marvels of 1918 that are still in use as dated, damaged and difficult to maintain shells in 2020.

The lack of imaginatio­n and ambition has been staggering. De Blasio keeps repeating that New York always comes back and that parents will roll with the punches as the pesky details answer themselves. They haven’t. It’s downright Trumpian.

New Yorkers have made it through tough times before, sometimes helped by their leaders and when necessary in spite of them.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States