New York Daily News

How to redistrict New York

- BY JOHN FASO Faso previously represente­d parts of the Catskills and Hudson Valley in Congress and as minority leader of the state Assembly. He was GOP candidate for governor in 2006.

It was good news that New York City gained population in the just-released 2020 census data. While New York State will lose a congressio­nal district, we defied earlier more pessimisti­c expectatio­ns that the state would lose two U.S. House seats.

The bad news, however, is that state and national Democrats see the Empire State as their prime candidate to effectuate a radical gerrymande­r of congressio­nal and legislativ­e districts to preserve their power both in Washington and Albany.

Standing in their way is the 2014 state constituti­onal amendment creating an Independen­t Redistrict­ing Commission (IRC) tasked with the job of redrawing legislativ­e and congressio­nal districts. Inspired by the relentless advocacy of former New York City Mayor Ed Koch, the state amendment for the first time in New York’s history establishe­d legal principles to direct this process. The line-drawing process is guided by strict standards to protect local communitie­s of interest, jurisdicti­onal boundaries, and ethnic and racial minority groups. The Constituti­on also directs that district lines should not be drawn to favor one party or candidate over another.

No system will ever be perfect, but the new process guiding New York’s redistrict­ing is manifestly better than what previously existed for more than 200 years. The IRC is finely balanced between Democrats and Republican­s, and the appointees are taking their role seriously and acting in a bipartisan fashion — as was intended by the framers of the amendment.

For instance, the IRC has hired a single, non-partisan line-drawing consultant to assist with the critical task of drawing legislativ­e and congressio­nal district lines. Also, the commission­ers earlier this year joined together to successful­ly oppose an effort by Gov. Cuomo and Democratic legislativ­e leaders to limit their independen­ce and insisted on adequate funding to complete its mission.

The IRC has already conducted a series of virtual hearings across the state to gather community input. The first draft of district lines is due Sept. 15, and the commission will then conduct another round of hearings, giving the public an opportunit­y to comment on the initial districtin­g plans. The commission is scheduled to submit final plans by the end of the year to the Legislatur­e for their approval, expected during January or February of 2022.

Once they get the plans in hand, legislator­s have two opportunit­ies to reject these plans, but under terms of a state law adopted in 2013 at the insistence of Cuomo and good-government groups, it is limited in making changes to the final plan submitted by the IRC. Ultimately, like any other state law, the plan creating new districts for the Legislatur­e and Congress must be signed into law by the governor, giving incoming Gov. Hochul a critical role in this process.

If it works as intended, this is New York’s way out of the poisonous, partisan gerrymande­ring that so many on both sides of the aisle, but especially liberals, complain relentless­ly about.

There is, however, one gigantic fly in the ointment. Albany politician­s have placed yet another redistrict­ing amendment on this November’s ballot which seeks to undermine the bipartisan nature of the new system. The new amendment removes protection­s for the minority party on the IRC — in this case New York Republican­s — and in a masterful bit of subterfuge, seeks to obscure their true intent by hiding these offending provisions around a group of innocuous and meaningles­s changes to other constituti­onal language relating to redistrict­ing. The minority party would no longer have equal administra­tive control on the IRC and the Legislatur­e could more easily ignore the commission recommenda­tions.

Democratic leaders have portrayed these changes as “reform,” but no one should be fooled. The real purpose of this new amendment is to eliminate key bipartisan protection­s contained in the 2014 amendment, paving the way to an extreme Democratic Party gerrymande­r of legislativ­e and congressio­nal districts. Regardless of party, voters need to be alerted to this classic bit of Albany legislativ­e skulldugge­ry and overwhelmi­ngly reject this effort to rig the political game in New York State for the next 10 years.

Ironically, Democrats in Washington are promoting non-partisan, independen­t redistrict­ing commission­s in H.R. 1, the so-called For the People Act, a massive federal preemption of state election laws and procedures. At the very same time, Albany Democrats are seeking to sabotage New York’s brandnew commission with last-minute changes giving themselves complete control over the process.

The IRC should be allowed to do its redistrict­ing work as Mayor Koch and New York voters directed — without dishonest and unnecessar­y changes to the state Constituti­on. The process which the people overwhelmi­ngly approved in 2014 should be allowed to work.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States