New York Daily News

Supreme surgery

-

When a Supreme Court with a conservati­ve supermajor­ity begins its new term today, hearing arguments in person again (sans COVID-positive Brett Kavanaugh) for the first time since the pandemic began, it will consider cases defining constituti­onal rights for the 21st century. We’ll have plenty to say in the coming weeks about gun safety in New York, abortion in Mississipp­i and more. The topic today is not the court’s rulings, but its shape and process.

Back on April 9 — under pressure from progressiv­es rightly incensed by Republican­s’ 2016 election-year refusal to give Merrick Garland a hearing, followed four years later by their galling election-year rush to install Amy Coney Barrett — President Biden created a commission to study changes to the court, including adding seats to the bench. The panel’s report is due back next month.

Though the Constituti­on is silent on the size of the Supreme Court, which fluctuated in the Republic’s early years, it’s been stuck at nine since 1869, notwithsta­nding Franklin Roosevelt’s ill-fated attempt to convince Congress to grow the number to 15.

The Biden panel should declare packing a non-starter. As satisfying as it might feel to left-wing partisans in the short term, it would give presidents a free hand to negate a judiciary check on their executive power. That’s bad enough under a president with healthy respect for American norms and downright disastrous under a President Trump (past or future).

Term limits are a more attractive notion; they would disincenti­vize the appointmen­t of relatively young jurists and end the ridiculous reality that the accident of when a justice expires can shift the balance for a generation.

While we await these grand debates, there’s a far more modest reform The Nine should adopt immediatel­y: live-stream all arguments going forward. An innovation adopted as the Supreme Court gallery closed to the public during the pandemic has given all Americans a vital and confidence-inspiring window into the workings of the nation’s highest judiciary panel. Keep it going past a likely expiration in December.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States