New York Daily News

Dismantle harassment protection machine

- BY ANDREW GOUNARDES Gounardes represents Bay Ridge, Dyker Heights and other neighborho­ods in the state Senate.

When Andrew Cuomo resigned from office, many wanted to believe that the system worked: The collective condemnati­on from advocates, elected officials, editorial boards and the general public forced the governor from power for abusing his authority and sexually harassing women in and out of the workplace.

But if we zoom out, the system’s failures are apparent, because while the rules of the game are meant to quickly sweep away bad actors after they are caught, they do nothing to prevent abuse and harassment from happening in the first place, or to protect workers when they try to stand up for themselves.

In the wake of the governor’s resignatio­n, I wrote that we all bear a responsibi­lity to “systematic­ally work to dismantle the institutio­ns and the cultures that foster and perpetuate harassment and work to change the norms — and laws — that protect harassers and their enablers.” As the Legislatur­e returns to Albany this month, here are five ways that we can begin this important work and protect and empower all workers.

Cover all workers under the state’s sexual harassment law. When the Legislatur­e passed (and Cuomo signed) a landmark law in 2019 to lower the burden of proof required to sustain charges of sexual harassment, we left a glaring loophole: employees who work for elected or judicial officials. The state has argued in several high-profile cases that workers experienci­ng sexual harassment by elected officials or judges are “personal staff” and therefore they are not liable under the law. Assemblywo­man Yuh-Line Niou and I have introduced legislatio­n to close this loophole.

Protect employees alleging harassment or discrimina­tion from frivolous defamation lawsuits. Victims of workplace discrimina­tion such as sexual harassment will frequently find themselves the subjects of defamation suits as a result of filing complaints. These retaliator­y tactics have the desired effect of getting the victim to abandon his or her complaint or significan­tly delaying the investigat­ion and adjudicati­on of the underlying complaint as well as deterring future victims at the worksite from coming forward. Workers experienci­ng harassment or discrimina­tion should not be silenced, and my proposal with Assemblywo­man Jo Anne Simon will prevent these frivolous suits, meant only to intimidate victims, from being filed.

Prevent employers from retaliatio­n by leaking confidenti­al personnel files. As we have seen with the former governor’s staff, employers sometimes weaponize confidenti­al personnel files against employees by leaking them to disparage or discredit a victim or witness of discrimina­tion in the workplace. My legislatio­n with Assemblywo­man Jessica González-Rojas would ban the release of personnel records as a form of retaliatio­n and allow a victimized employee the right to file a complaint with the attorney general, who would then commence an investigat­ion into the retaliatio­n.

Allow employees the right to review their personnel records. Knowledge is power, and there’s no better way to empower workers than to proactivel­y grant them the right to review their personnel records so they know what informatio­n is in their file, as well as give them notice whenever negative informatio­n affecting their employment status, promotiona­l opportunit­ies or potential disciplina­ry action is filed against them. Under my bill with Assemblywo­man González-Rojas, workers would have the opportunit­y to challenge the negative informatio­n filed against them by submitting a written objection. Granting workers this proactive right will inspire an open and transparen­t dialogue between employees and their employers while providing some recourse for employees to remove knowingly false or defamatory statements from their records.

Ban “no rehire” clauses in harassment and discrimina­tion settlement agreements. Settlement agreements in cases of sexual harassment or workplace discrimina­tion will often include terms that bar an employee from applying or working for a defendant employer ever again. While initially used to protect employers from dishonest plaintiffs, this tactic has come to limit the ability of an employee to pursue career opportunit­ies. These clauses are used by all kinds of employers, big and small, and represent millions of employment opportunit­ies. They have become de facto non-compete clauses that lock workers out of entire industries. I am partnering with Assemblywo­man Catalina Cruz to ban the use of these settlement terms.

If we are serious about the condemnati­on we express when abusers fall from grace, we must also be willing to change the laws that protect harassers and leave survivors vulnerable. Taken together, these five measures will help to dismantle the structures that perpetuate workplace harassment and discrimina­tion and promote inclusive and supportive workplaces. As we enter the new legislativ­e session, the Legislatur­e — and our new governor — have a great opportunit­y to demonstrat­e that we’re up for this challenge.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States