New York Daily News

WHY IT CAME DOWN TO DON’S HUSH MONEY FOR STORMY

DA’s probe takes many twists and turns as it approaches indictment

- BY MOLLY CRANE-NEWMAN

More than four years after it was launched, the Manhattan district attorney’s long-lived criminal probe into Donald Trump is potentiall­y about to produce the first criminal indictment ever filed against a former U.S. president.

District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office has been presenting evidence to a grand jury since January. The panel is believed to be hearing about the infamous $130,000 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels to buy her silence about an extramarit­al tryst with Trump.

Sources close to the probe say the DA is exploring whether Trump committed felony-level crimes in reimbursin­g his longtime fixer Michael Cohen for paying off Daniels on the eve of the 2016 presidenti­al election to help secure the win. Cohen went to prison for the payoff, his federal case detailing how he executed it when Daniels was ready to go public with her allegation­s she slept with Trump in 2006 at a Lake Tahoe charity golf tournament.

Bragg’s office has remained tight-lipped on the confidenti­al grand jury probe, and there is no telling whether the panel of New Yorkers will vote to indict Trump. The former president has speculated his arrest is imminent, but sources with direct knowledge say he had not been notified of any charges stemming from the ongoing investigat­ion.

But Cohen’s recent testimony, an invitation to meet with the grand jury extended to Trump — which he declined — and prosecutor­s having interviewe­d Daniels, Kellyanne Conway, Hope Hicks and several Trump associates connected to the hush money deal have inflamed speculatio­n that the DA is on the verge of deciding whether to charge Trump once and for all.

The potential charges come after a long-running investigat­ion exploring the hush money and Trump’s allegedly illegal business practices.

The expansive probe twice made it to the U.S. Supreme Court — with the Trump appointee-heavy panel shooting the president down both times — and branched off criminal tax fraud cases against the Trump Organizati­on and its longtime finance chief Allen Weisselber­g. The company was fined $1.6 million in January after its conviction at trial, and Weisselber­g is serving a five-month jail term at Rikers.

Bragg’s predecesso­r, Cy Vance Jr., launched the investigat­ion soon after Cohen’s 2018 federal conviction for tax evasion, making illegal campaign contributi­ons, and lying to Congress and a financial

institutio­n. After his guilty plea, Cohen continued to sing, showing lawmakers checks signed by Trump as reimbursem­ent for paying off Daniels when he testified before the House Oversight committee.

During legal battles for Trump’s taxes, Vance’s office revealed the probe was also exploring Cohen’s allegation­s that Trump, for years, wildly manipulate­d the value of assets like golf clubs, resorts and skyscraper­s by hundreds of millions of dollars.

The New York attorney general’s office ultimately brought the large-scale financial fraud case against Trump and his adult children, all executives in the company, in a $250 million civil lawsuit filed in September.

Attorney General Letitia James’ suit accuses Trump of overstatin­g his net worth by more than a billion dollars and habitually engaging in rampant tax fraud, bank fraud and business fraud as head of the Trump Organizati­on. James had two investigat­ors embedded in the Manhattan DA’s probe.

Why Bragg chose to refocus on the most salacious element of the expansive probe — or whether he abandoned other avenues of pursuit — remains to be seen.

When he took office at the start of 2022, the DA’s differing approach to his predecesso­r came under scrutiny when investigat­ors hired by Vance quit in protest, alleging Bragg was refusing to authorize a Trump indictment.

Grand jury testimony is confidenti­al, but the hush-money deal has long been public knowledge. Per Cohen’s 2018 guilty plea, Trump directed him to pay off Daniels “for the principal purpose of influencin­g the election,” and Cohen took the money out of a home equity line of credit and wired it to Daniels through a shell company.

Trump got the bill after he became president, reimbursin­g Cohen with interest in monthly checks totaling $420,000 by the end of 2017, according to the feds’ case. Cohen then falsely invoiced the company for a “retainer agreement” that the Trump Organizati­on falsely logged it in its books as “legal expenses.”

As Bragg came under pressure last spring to explain his strategies on the Trump probe, the DA insisted it remained alive and that he’d be forthcomin­g with the American people once a decision was made on whether to indict Trump.

“I unequivoca­lly pledge that the office will publicly state the conclusion of our investigat­ion — whether we conclude our work without bringing charges, or move forward with an indictment,” Bragg said.

On Saturday, Trump said he expects that that conclusion might come as soon as this week, then called on supporters to “protest” his arrest.

 ?? ??
 ?? AP ?? Donald Trump could soon be first ex-president in U.S. to be indicted in a case that’s involved his ex-finance chief Allen Weisselber­g (below left) and ex-fixer Michael Cohen (below right).
AP Donald Trump could soon be first ex-president in U.S. to be indicted in a case that’s involved his ex-finance chief Allen Weisselber­g (below left) and ex-fixer Michael Cohen (below right).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States