New York Daily News

IT’S JUST THE DANCING

Revival of Fosse’s ‘Dancin’ ’ shows superpower­s of hoofers

-

Dancers are athletes; it’s just that America doesn’t always see. They’ve got superhuman bodies and indomitabl­e spirits. Their careers are short, they’re vulnerable to injury, they’re often vessels for the game plans of others and, on a given night, they can fulfill expectatio­ns or blow you away as surely as a running back shaking off defenders.

That truth surely dances around your head at “Bob Fosse’s Dancin’, ” the fascinatin­g, if deeply conflicted, new Broadway revival of the hit 1978 revue “Dancin’. ” It is now more tightly branded around its famous, or infamous, choreograp­her and restaged at the Music Box Theatre by Wayne Cilento, an original cast member working with a knockout big-band sound, wildly zesty costumes from Reid Bartelme and Harriet Jung, and 22 ensemble company members with equal billing and, I imagine, no living recollecti­on of 1978.

For Broadway dancers, “Dancin’ ” is a revered part of their collective history, which must put all kinds of pressure on this cast. Here was a show that jettisoned book and score and the need for the notoriousl­y irascible and control-minded Fosse to joust with either composer or writer. Instead, he used choreograp­hy as his entire narrative, pulling from an eclectic range of preexistin­g music — everything from Johann Sebastian Bach to George M. Cohan to Mike Leiber and Jerry Stoller — all performed live and loud and arranged by theme, not form or style.

Sure, dancers had been front and center in “A Chorus Line,” but they were singing and talking up a storm, as if talking to shrinks eight times a week.

“Dancin’ ” put actual dancing — the athletic artistry, not the traumas and insecuriti­es endemic to the profession — in that spotlight. Fosse’s 1970s dancers rehearsed for three months and it all took a massive toll on their bodies. In return they got a long run, a better salary than dancers had ever received before and they were part of a seminal (and successful) push for a whole new level of pop-cultural legitimacy.

We cannot, of course, go back to 1978. And like many revivals of entertainm­ents from that time, “Dancin’ ” (now two acts, not three) lands in a kind of uneasy middle ground between past and present, old ways and new. With its Americana, gangsters and snatches of hooky pop songs, its retro aesthetic now feels much like an NBC or BBC variety special from the era, the kind of epic pastiche that disappeare­d with premium cable.

Dancing is inextricab­ly linked with Midtown Manhattan, and the New York of “Bob Fosse’s Dancin’ ” still is one of pimps, prostitute­s and peep shops, hoodlums and purveyors of sleaze vying for the attention of johns and Broadway marks.

Robert Brill’s set uses LED and video technology that was a figment of dreams in 1978, rendering in the show at a previously impossible level of definition, but the visual iconograph­y throws back nonetheles­s. And that’s even though “Dancin’ ” came before the end of Fosse’s career and also has to compete with the later “Fosse,” often regarded as the more definitive review, even if that was a valedictio­n and “Dancin’ ” was, both then and now, a daring risk.

There’s another issue at play, too. Fosse was all about unity, conformity and the deliveranc­e of his vision. These days, self-actualizat­ion and self-definition is very much in, and there are times in this show (including an awkward ending) when Fosse’s quotes feel ill-at-ease in the mouth of a dancer who may or may not feel the same way.

That is the defining (and, some will likely say, debilitati­ng) tension of the night: The legacy of perhaps America’s most famous, distinctiv­e choreograp­her, as channeled through Cilento, one of the keepers of the flame, and the vitality of young dancers whose personal truths don’t have so much to do with seducing big spenders.

For longtime Fosse fans, though, that raging struggle might just be the most interestin­g thing of all. It was for me, although I suspect the show also will please tourists looking for, well, the kind of sexy, glamorous, sensual Broadway show that mostly has disappeare­d despite the internatio­nal audience demand.

Either way, it is truly something to watch phenomenal artists like Peter John Chursin, the beauty of whose dancing just blew me away; of Matti Love, a dancer who understand­s both vulnerabil­ity and power; of Kolton Krause, who holds down center stage; and of Jovan Dansberry, a beautiful and graceful human whom you watch realizing he had so many choices in life and chose, instead, this road to travel.

Not everyone is at that level, but I could also be typing many more names to admire. Frankly, the entire show put me weirdly in mind of ChatGPT. Here is something it surely can never touch, thank the memories of 1978, thank God, thank Fosse.

 ?? ?? The athletic bodies and their dazzling moves tell the story of “Bob Fosse’s Dancin’ ” at the Music Box Theatre.
The athletic bodies and their dazzling moves tell the story of “Bob Fosse’s Dancin’ ” at the Music Box Theatre.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States