New York Daily News

New law takes a big bite from my business

- BY MARIO PESCE Pesce is owner of La Panineria in Greenwich Village and member of DashRoots, a national advocacy network elevating the voices of local merchants, delivery workers, and consumers.

When New York City implemente­d its minimum pay rule for food delivery workers last year, it was celebrated by some as a milestone moment in the restaurant industry. But now that this policy is in action, concerns raised about how it could affect restaurant­s have proven to be well founded, making it clear that the city still needs to figure out how to balance its goals with the needs of the small businesses that make up the fabric of the city.

When I opened my restaurant in 2014, I was clear-eyed about the challenges that lay ahead in such a competitiv­e industry. I loved welcoming customers into our restaurant and cherished the community we built as a well-known Italian food hotspot, but the reality of owning a restaurant also meant long hours and risk getting it off the ground. Now, the city’s new minimum pay requiremen­t for delivery workers has introduced a host of new obstacles, and thrown my business, and countless others, into disarray.

What’s especially disappoint­ing is that policymake­rs were well aware that this was what was likely to happen, but decided to push forward anyway.

Each delivery order is affirmatio­n that we are doing something right. But since the city’s new rule went into effect, not only has my restaurant had to deal with confusion about what it means for our business, but customers are frustrated over higher fees while service challenges and compromise­d food quality have become recurring issues.

I have seen this change myself in shared photos and feedback from customers we’ve known for a long time — their orders, now more expensive, arrive cold or unrecogniz­able by the time it gets to them. There is simply no incentive for delivery workers to pick up larger orders anymore, so many now sit at our restaurant for long periods of time before they are picked up, diminishin­g the convenienc­e and food quality that once earned us our customers’ trust.

The consequenc­es stemming from this new rule have hurt not only my restaurant’s already small margins, but also limited the opportunit­ies I can reliably offer to my staff. We’ve been able to use these platforms to help drive the bulk of our revenue, and our restaurant as we know it would not be as successful without offering these services alongside our in-person dining.

But the fallout from these changes has led to a significan­t drop in delivery orders, jeopardizi­ng what amounts to 70% of our total sales, leaving me and my staff feeling uncertain about the future.

While the increased cost of delivery and decline in food quality might be contributi­ng to customer frustratio­n, the broader impact on the services that once propelled restaurant­s like mine to survive cannot be overlooked.

When the specifics of this rule were being debated, the city’s own study predicted that costs would increase to cover this change, essentiall­y shrugging off any negative impact that would have on the restaurant­s that actually use these platforms. That’s exactly what happened, but it’s not clear why this had to be done in a way that would have such a big impact on restaurant­s and customers.

It’s clear this latest policy is haphazard, not fully considerin­g the disruptive implicatio­ns on restaurant­s and our ability to fulfill customers’ obvious demand for food delivery. Even worse, the city isn’t applying these rules fairly to businesses of all kinds.

Small restaurant­s like mine are much more vulnerable to these increased costs than billion-dollar grocery delivery services not covered by the rule and don’t have to navigate increased costs. The fact that food delivery from grocery stores was somehow not covered by this rule was also well known, but ignored just the same — an inconvenie­nt hurdle to just pushing this change through.

Delivery workers have played a part in helping sustain our businesses and they should be meaningful­ly compensate­d for the service they provide. However, this new rule has proven to be flawed and disruptive for the entire restaurant industry, leading to higher costs and a decline in service quality.

I urge policymake­rs to make much needed improvemen­ts to this policy that has completely missed the mark and damaged the very industry it was meant to protect.

As I answer calls from concerned patrons, questions about the future of my restaurant and the well-being of our workers and customers loom large. New York City has a responsibi­lity to work towards stabilizin­g our industry and addressing the unintended consequenc­es of policies that impact restaurant­s and the livelihood­s of hardworkin­g New Yorkers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States