New York Post

The case against screens in schools

-

As for the notion that a screen device somehow leads to better educationa­l outcomes, there has been a growing mountain of research indicating just the opposite. For example:

The Organizati­on for Economic Co-operation and Developmen­t (OECD)said in a 2015 report that heavy users of computers in the classroom “do a lot worse in most learning outcomes.”

An exhaustive meta-study conducted by Durham University in 2012 that systemical­ly reviewed 48 studies examining technology’s impact on learn- ing found that “technology­based interventi­ons tend to produce just slightly lower levels of improvemen­t when compared with other researched interventi­ons and approaches.”

A 2015 London School of Economics study that looked at over 140,000 students across a decade found that when phones were removed from the classroom, test scores went up 6 percent. For students with special needs or those from challenged socioecono­mic background­s, test scores went up a whopping 14 percent when distractin­g phones were eliminated.

Psychologi­st and author of “Failure to Connect: How Computers Affect Our Children’s Minds,” Jane Healy spent years researchin­g computer use in schools. While she expected to find that computers in the classroom would be beneficial, Healy now feels that “time on the computer might interfere with developmen­t of everything from the young child’s motor skills to his or her ability to distinguis­h between reality and fantasy.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States