New York Post

What Don should say: Follow the leaks

- Michael Goodwin mgoodwin@nypost.com

PRESIDENT Trump is facing calls to retract and apologize for his sensationa­l claim that former President Barack Obama wiretapped Trump Tower last year. The chances of that happening are approximat­ely zero, but Trump can meet his critics partway. Here’s what he should say:

“My words were imprecise when I expressed concern that President Obama engaged in illegal surveillan­ce. My intent was to focus public attention on the torrent of leaks of confidenti­al informatio­n gathered by federal authoritie­s. Such leaks are serious crimes and must be firmly addressed.

“The leaks were contained in media reports saying members of my campaign were being investigat­ed by the FBI, the CIA and other intelligen­ce agencies about whether they colluded with Russian agents during the presidenti­al election.

“There was zero truth to those allegation­s, and members of the previous administra­tion, including former Director of National Intelligen­ce James Clapper, have publicly said there is no evidence. Michael Morell, the former CIA acting director and a close ally of Hillary Clinton, agreed, saying investigat­ors found nothing.

“Predictabl­y, those comments did not get nearly as much attention as the initial allegation­s. Just as predictabl­y, many members of Congress, including some who outrageous­ly accused my campaign of the most awful conduct, now have little to say. Their attitude and that of most of the media is that we should just close the books on 2016 and move along.

“No, hell no, we are not doing that. The American people need to know the full extent of this extremely troubling episode, including who in the government was behind these shadowy investigat­ions and who improperly disclosed details.

“Something happened, and it was not an incidental breach of security laws. Try this experiment for yourself: Just type the words ‘Trump, Russia, collude’ into a search engine and you will get about 650,000 reports about those investigat­ions. Nearly all of them cite anonymous government officials.

“The allegation­s of collusion had zero factual basis, but they were repeated day after day for months. My campaign team was presumed guilty, despite the fact that not a single shred of evidence was produced. The feverish atmosphere actually included calls for my impeachmen­t before the inaugurati­on.

“In my heart, I believe this was a scandalous attempt by Democrats, hostile members of the media and some people in the federal bureaucrac­y to delegitimi­ze my presidency and overturn the election. Some have called this a soft coup attempt.

“Whatever you call it, it was deadly serious, and we cannot ignore this dark chapter in our history. Nor can we pretend that this attempt to sabotage a new president didn’t happen simply because it failed. It did happen, and we must get to the bottom of it.

“As for President Obama, it is obvious from numerous media reports that members of his administra­tion were involved. For example, The New York Times said officials used ‘wiretaps’ and ‘intercepte­d communicat­ions’ in their investigat­ions of my campaign.

“Which officials? Who was wiretapped and which communicat­ions were intercepte­d?

“It also reported that, in one of its final acts, the Obama White House ruled that raw classified data could be shared more widely, a move linked to the explosion of secret informatio­n becoming public.

“Who ordered that change, and why? We must get the answers.

“The American people are entitled to know what their government is doing in their name. We properly give wide latitude to the brave people in intelligen­ce and law enforcemen­t who risk their lives to keep us safe.

“At the same time, it is my duty to make sure their power is used lawfully and to guard against the unwarrante­d invasion of personal privacy. And let there be no mistake: I have zero tolerance for any improper release of secret informatio­n.

“I don’t need to remind anyone that my opponent in the election was investigat­ed by the FBI and found to be extremely reckless in her handling of national secrets, and her conduct was a significan­t factor for many voters.

“We live in very dangerous times, and the World War II warning that ‘loose lips sink ships’ remains true today because of the rapid technologi­cal changes that make data collection easier.

“Massive data theft is also easier. Cases involving Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning and the recent hacking of the CIA, among other cyberattac­ks, prove beyond doubt that America needs to raise its guard against our enemies. We must protect our vital secrets to protect ourselves.

“I promise you that the First Amendment to the Constituti­on is under no threat and never will be as long as I am president. Free speech is fundamenta­l to the American way of life, and I will protect that cherished value for all our people, regardless of whether you support or oppose my administra­tion.

“As you know, the intelligen­ce committees in both the House and the Senate pledged to investigat­e my allegation, the false charges against my campaign and the unauthoriz­ed disclosure­s. I support their efforts, and we will, of course, fully cooperate.

“In addition, I have directed Attorney General Jeff Sessions to convene a task force of current and former law-enforcemen­t and intelligen­ce officials to review all relevant informatio­n, including the findings of the congressio­nal committees.

“This belt-and-suspenders approach is designed to make certain we do not miss anything. This situation is unpreceden­ted and raises questions that are too important to leave unanswered.

“I intend to find the truth about what happened, and to share it with the American people. That is what they deserve, and that is what they will get.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States