New York Post

BIG HATE PARADE

Google ad cancellati­ons could cost $1B: analyst

- Catkinson@nypost.com By CLAIRE ATKINSON

A growing avalanche of advertiser­s are boycotting Google for placing ads next to extremist and otherwise offensive content — and it could turn into a billion-dollar problem, according to one Wall Street analyst.

AT&T, Verizon and Johnson & Johnson, among the largest US advertiser­s, said Wednesday they were pulling their ads from a variety of Google platforms, including YouTube, until they are satisfied their brands aren’t popping up next to internet garbage.

Pharma giant GSK, the maker of Excedrin and Aquafresh and a host of other consumer health care and prescripti­on drug brands, and Enterprise, the car rental company, also pulled ad dollars from Google.

Verizon made the move after a report in the Times of London said its ads were being displayed next to YouTube videos of a radical Egyptian cleric banned from the US. Google had disabled UK advertiser­s, but US advertiser­s continued to show up there, according to the report.

AT&T’s ads, meanwhile, were found on a Web site featuring al Qaeda operatives.

This week, Brian Wieser of Pivotal Research was the first analyst to downgrade Google because of the dustup.

The problems began last week when marketing giant Havas pulled its ads from Google’s YouTube UK following a report that British government ads played on videos featuring white supremacis­t David Duke and anti-Semite pastor Steve Anderson.

Google will feel the impact of the advertiser pullout on its bottom line, Wieser told The Post. Instead of discussing during the upcoming negotiatio­ns with ad-buying firms how to steal away TV dollars, the media and tech juggernaut will have to answer concerns about “brand safety issues,” Wieser said.

The impact could amount to about 1 percent of total revenue, or $1 billion, he said.

The company has apologized for the problem and has said it will revamp tools for advertiser­s to help correct the issues.

But “Google’s stated solution was late and woeful,” Wieser said. “Given numerous opportunit­ies to nip it in the bud, they’ve seemingly made it worse.”

“We are deeply concerned that our ads may have appeared alongside YouTube content promoting terrorism and hate,” said a spokespers­on for AT&T, which along with Verizon competes with Google for ad dollars. “Until Google can ensure this won’t happen again, we are removing our ads from Google’s non-search platforms.”

The nation’s No. 2 advertiser (behind Procter & Gamble), AT&T is spending $3.3 billion on paid advertisin­g, according to Advertisin­g Age. Verizon, ranked No. 5, is spending $2.5 billion.

“Once we were notified that our ads were appearing on non-sanctioned Web sites, we took immediate action to suspend this type of ad placement and launched an investigat­ion,” Verizon said.

“We are working with all of our digital advertisin­g partners to understand the weak links so we can prevent this from happening in the future,” Verizon said.

Verizon acquired both Yahoo and AOL in order to compete with Google for ad dollars.

 ??  ?? Google CEO Larry Page is feeling pressure from more major advertiser­s — AT&T and Verizon among them — that pulled their ads on Wednesday until they can be sure their content won’t appear with objectiona­ble videos.
Google CEO Larry Page is feeling pressure from more major advertiser­s — AT&T and Verizon among them — that pulled their ads on Wednesday until they can be sure their content won’t appear with objectiona­ble videos.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States