New York Post

Seeds of Doubt

How Comey’s hearing made trouble for Trump

- jpodhoretz@gmail.com JOHN PODHORETZ

JAMES Comey thinks, but did not say, that President Trump is going to be toast once the special counsel is done with him — and all because of three little words Trump might have sung in the manner of Elsa the Ice Queen: “Let this go.”

Comey clearly intimated that Trump’s conduct toward him was an effort to obstruct justice when it came to the investigat­ion of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn — and that special counsel Robert Mueller would be just the guy to get to the bottom of what is clearly an impeachabl­e offense.

That was the key revelation of the former FBI director’s gripping Senate hearing Thursday. Comey said the president’s behavior at a February White House dinner — during which Trump cleared the room so he and Comey could have a private tete-a-tete about Flynn — had “stunned” him.

That was when, according to the document he released Wednesday, Trump said to him, “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go.”

Comey said he believed this was intended as “direction” and he found it “a very disturbing thing, very concerning” the president would say such a thing.

Republican Sen. Jim Risch sought to limit the damage from Comey’s words by pointing out that hoping for something would not be grounds for charging someone with a crime. Comey replied: “This is a president of the United States with me alone saying ‘I hope this.’ I took it as, this is what he wants me to do.”

Comey said that, “as an investigat­or” himself, “of significan­t fact to me is so why did he kick everybody out of the Oval Office? Why would you kick the attorney general, the vice president, the chief of staff out to talk to me?” This was a clear suggestion that Mueller, his fellow investigat­or, would likely see the same significan­ce he did.

Asked by Sen. Richard Burr if the president had sought to obstruct justice, Comey replied coyly, “I don’t think it’s for me to say ... That’s a conclusion I’m sure the special counsel will work towards to try and understand what the intention was there, and whether that’s an offense.”

That “disturbing, concerning” thing is now Mueller’s bailiwick. Mueller, also a former director of the FBI, is, in Comey’s words, “a dogged, tough person and you can have high confidence when he’s done, he’s turned over all of the rocks.” Translatio­n for Trump: Uh-oh. Now, Comey could be wrong. He’s been wrong before. He was wrong to give a press conference on July 5 last year that effectivel­y indicted Hillary Clinton before announcing she wouldn’t be charged for mishandlin­g classified informatio­n — a colossally unfair thing to do.

And he was wrong to go public on October 28 about reopening the Hillary investigat­ion, an irresponsi­ble declaratio­n that may have had a material effect on the presidenti­al election.

But in suggesting what a fellow investigat­or might find problemati­c in Trump’s behavior, Comey can probably be trusted.

There was some good news for Trump: Comey’s testimony effectivel­y ended the speculatio­n that the president was personally under investigat­ion of any sort for collusion with Russia in the 2016 election.

On Wednesday, Comey acknowledg­ed he had told Trump on three occasions the president wasn’t under counterint­elligence investigat­ion. After Comey released that written statement, Washington Talmudists read deeply into it to suggest Comey might have been signaling Trump was the subject of a different kind of investigat­ion. Comey told both Sens. Marco Rubio and Susan Collins there was none.

“Mr. Comey has now finally confirmed publicly what he repeatedly told the president privately,” said Trump lawyer Marc Kasowitz. “The president was not under investigat­ion as part of any probe into Russian interferen­ce. He also admitted that there is no evidence that a single vote changed as a result of any Russian interferen­ce.”

The problem for Trump is that he’s under investigat­ion now.

And this investigat­ion, as the Washington Free Beacon’s Matthew Continetti pointed out, arose due to a strange tweet Trump issued right after Comey’s firing about how “Comey better hope there are no ‘tapes’ of our conversati­ons before he starts leaking to the press!”

This triggered Comey’s decision to release, through a friend to The New York Times, his own contempora­neous memo about the president’s effort to pressure him. As Continetti writes, “By firing Comey and then tweeting recklessly about it, Trump elevated a long-running but manageable problem — the so-called ‘Russia thing’ — into an independen­t investigat­ion that seriously endangers his presidency.”

Twitter giveth — and may taketh away. And all because Trump couldn’t let it go.

 ??  ?? A tall order: Ex-FBI chief on his way to continue testifying Thursday.
A tall order: Ex-FBI chief on his way to continue testifying Thursday.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States