New York Post

National Insecurity

Blas vs. feds gets personal — and it’s putting NY lives at risk

- DAN DONOVAN & PETER KING Republican Reps. Dan Donovan and Peter King represent New York’s 11th and 2nd Congressio­nal Districts, respective­ly.

MAYOR de Blasio and Congress are putting the lives of New Yorkers at risk. De Blasio by his stubborn refusal to comply with federal law and cooperate with immigratio­n authoritie­s; Congress by its overreacti­on in attempting to cut homeland-security funds that the NYPD and FDNY need to protect New York from terrorist attacks.

On Thursday, the House of Rep- resentativ­es is scheduled to consider legislatio­n to punish sanctuary cities by excluding them from any “grant administer­ed by the ... Department of Homeland Security that is substantia­lly related to law enforcemen­t [and] terrorism.” Some of these grant programs were developed specifical­ly in response to terror attacks on New York City.

Eliminatin­g homeland-security and anti-terror funding for New York is reckless, irresponsi­ble and indefensib­le. Protecting Gotham’s 8.5 million people — including tens of thousands of cops, firefighte­rs and first responders who risk their lives to keep us safe — has become a disturbing game of “chicken.”

Cities shouldn’t be able to pick and choose which laws to follow. New York City is shameless in its unwillingn­ess to cooperate with federal immigratio­n authoritie­s, and it should be held accountabl­e for its actions.

Some reasonable consequenc­es might include withholdin­g Department of Justice grants intended to help City Hall enforce immigratio­n laws. After all, it doesn’t make much sense to give enforcemen­t money to a city that doesn’t do much enforcing.

And the city hasn’t made many friends in Washington with its inyour-face response to the Trump administra­tion’s (quite reasonable) demand that New York comply with the law of the land. Particular­ly galling is that city taxpayers might foot the legal bills for violent criminals trying to avoid deportatio­n.

But the bill we’re voting on this week takes the consequenc­es to a dangerous extreme. It would make New York City ineligible for hundreds of millions of dollars every year that go toward thwarting terror attacks. These dollars have no connection to immigratio­n whatsoever, except for the fact that the NYPD hunts down terror threats and also sometimes arrests illegal aliens.

It’s a cruel irony that security concerns over criminal undocument­ed immigrants have been given as a rationale for a bill that disembowel­s the anti-terror apparatus in the world’s top terror target.

Take the Urban Areas Security Initiative, one of the many grant programs on the chopping block. It provided New York City with $180 million in anti-terror funding last year alone. The NYPD and FDNY used that money for groundbrea­king initiative­s like the Domain Awareness System, which analyzes troves of data, including cameras and license-plate readers, to track real-time threats and respond immediatel­y to life-threatenin­g situations. The initiative also pays for bomb-sniffing dogs and active shooter training.

Another initiative, the Transit Security Grant Program, protects critical transporta­tion hubs from terror threats. This isn’t a hypothetic­al — last year, a would-be bomber got into a shootout with New Jersey police officers after planting explosives at train stations. We passed legislatio­n to strengthen the program because it’s so important to our security. These measures protect our city every day.

Every week, there’s a new terror attack or threat against the West. The NYPD has its own intelligen­ce-analysis division with assets deployed across the world, and much of this work is funded by federal anti-terror grants.

There have been 199 ISIS-linked plots to attack the West or Western targets since 2013, 21 of them in the first months of 2017 alone. In New York City, anti-terror officials have thwarted 25 attacks since 2001.

Most worryingly, there have been 39 homegrown-jihadist cases in 20 states in the past 12 months. Lone-attacker scenarios are notoriousl­y difficult to predict; oftentimes, authoritie­s have no hint of them until they’re in progress.

Such attacks require immediate, forceful, coordinate­d responses to minimize loss of life. These highly choreograp­hed operations demand intensive training, which is also funded in part by federal antiterror grants.

It’s unsettling to have to make the public case against eliminatin­g federal anti-terror initiative­s for New York City. When lives are at stake — and the events nearly 16 years ago in New York make it tragically clear that they indeed are — political calculatio­ns must take a back seat to common sense.

US authoritie­s have to be hypervigil­ant now more than ever. De Blasio’s sanctuary-city policies are wrongheade­d, but security for innocent New Yorkers, cops, firefighte­rs and first responders shouldn’t be jeopardize­d because of it.

 ??  ?? Let them do their jobs: NYPD Counterter­rorism officers guarding City Hall.
Let them do their jobs: NYPD Counterter­rorism officers guarding City Hall.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States