New York Post

A Very Modern Gal

No, ‘Wonder Woman’ isn’t a ‘step backwards’

- Julie Gunlock is a senior fellow at the Independen­t Women’s Forum. JULIE GUNLOCK

JAMES Cameron, the director of a number of highly grossing blockbuste­r films such as “The Terminator,” sci-fi spectacle “Avatar” and “Titanic,” isn’t “the king of the world” this week. After hurling a trio of insults at Patty Jenkins, the director of the summer mega-hit “Wonder Woman,” Cameron is finding himself the target of feminist ire. It’s well deserved. In an interview with the Guardian, Cameron said the movie was a “step backwards” for women, even calling the superhero an “objectifie­d woman.” And in a stunningly rude move, he dismissed the praise the film’s actors and director have received as only “self-congratula­tory back-patting.”

While some might dismiss Cameron’s statement as the normal and legitimate criticism one director offers another in the industry, many women will view his comments more negatively (even reminiscen­t of that of that harmless yet petty ex-boyfriend annoyed by a former girlfriend’s success — ahem ... Kathryn Bigelow). Or worse for Cameron’s brand, women may view his callous insults as evidence that he’s utterly confused about what women want to see in movies. You know, simple things: thoughtful plot lines, character developmen­ts and relationsh­ips between men and women that don’t come off as high school-level love triangles on a sinking ship.

Of course, a careful read of the Guardian interview reveals a more basic motivation behind his spiteful reaction to the movie: Narcissism. Explaining his reaction to the Wonder Woman character, Cameron made clear he has trouble reconcilin­g the fact that modern female superheroe­s look different from the fictional female protagonis­ts he developed for Terminator and Terminator II.

According to Cameron, Sara Connor — the main female character in the early Terminator franchise — was a far better female icon, because, despite being stunningly beautiful and possessing a Crossfit-champion level of physical fitness, Connor “wasn’t a beauty icon.” Cameron also suggests Conner is a better representa­tion of a woman be- cause she was “troubled” and was “a terrible mother.”

Perhaps Cameron is trying to make the case for complexity and against what he sees as cultural standards of female heroism, both physical and intellectu­al. But here’s how it actually sounds: The marks of a real woman, to Cameron are homeliness, troubled minds and crappy parenting skills. Is anyone surprised James Cameron’s been married five times?

Cameron’s correct that actress Gal Gadot’s version of Wonder Woman is different than most female movie versions of superheroe­s. Gadot plays Wonder Woman not just as a feminist but also as genuinely feminine, softhearte­d and nurturing. Her Wonder Woman is even motherly — quick to coo over babies, likable, unfailingl­y kind and even emotionall­y atuned to the pain of children.

These traits, the politicall­y incorrect would say, are womanly characteri­stics, and entirely inconsiste­nt with what Cameron views as a tough female role model and superhero for the 21st century. Wrong. In a statement responding to Cameron’s jibes, Jenkins rejects those notions as well as Cameron’s suggestion that softness and femininity are barriers to superhero-club status. One can almost see Jenkins slow-walking Cameron through Women 101, writing, “If women always have to be hard, tough and troubled to be strong, and we aren’t free to be multidimen­sional or celebrate an icon of women everywhere because she is attractive and loving, then we haven’t come very far have we?”

The happy news is that women have come far — from the days where women were expected to only serve certain roles and from the one-dimensiona­l depictions provided for years on TV and in the movies. Jenkins understand­s women’s true progress — a concept lost on Cameron and, sadly, many Hollywood executives who continue to refuse women the directorsh­ips of major studio production­s.

We should forgive Cameron’s sloppy yammering about women — clearly a subject he finds confusing. But he would be wise to learn from his this situation and recognize that tactless and mean-spirited comments like those he made about Wonder Women don’t go unnoticed — particular­ly among women he might someday want to purchase movie tickets.

 ??  ?? Whipping up a frenzy: Contra James Cameron, Gal Gadot is the hero female audiences need and deserve.
Whipping up a frenzy: Contra James Cameron, Gal Gadot is the hero female audiences need and deserve.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States