Yahoo breach gets messier
A federal judge said Yahoo must face litigation brought on behalf of well over 1 billion users who said their personal information was compromised in three massive data breaches.
The ruling Wednesday night from US District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, Calif., was a setback for efforts by Verizon Communications, which paid $4.76 billion for Yahoo’s internet business in June, to limit potential liability.
The global breaches occurred between 2013 and 2016, but Yahoo was slow to disclose them, wait- ing more than three years to reveal the first. Revelations about the scope of the cyberattacks prompted Verizon to lower its purchase price for the company.
In a 93-page decision, Koh rejected Yahoo’s contention that breach victims lacked standing to sue, and said they could pursue some breach of contract and unfair competition claims.
“All plaintiffs have alleged a risk of future identity theft, in addition to loss of value of their personal identification information,” the judge wrote.
Koh said some plaintiffs alleged they had spent money to thwart future identity theft or that fraudsters had misused their data.
Others, meanwhile, could have changed passwords or canceled their accounts to stem losses had Yahoo not delayed disclosing the breaches, the judge said.
While many claims were dismissed, Koh said the plaintiffs could amend their complaint to address her concerns.
“We believe it to be a significant victory for consumers, and will address the deficiencies the court pointed out,” John Yanchunis, a lawyer for the plaintiffs who chairs an executive committee overseeing the case, said in an interview. “It’s the biggest data breach in the history of the world.”
Verizon spokesman Bob Varettoni said the New Yorkbased company declined to comment on pending litigation.
Yahoo, which was led by Chief Executive Marissa Meyer (right) at the time, is now part of a Verizon unit called Oath.
The August 2013 breach affected more than 1 billion accounts, while the 2014 breach affected more than 500 million. A third breach occurred in 2015 and 2016.