New York Post

Bucking Trump

An Obama-era policy is funneling millions to at least three left-wing groups fighting the president

- Paul Sperry, formerly Investor’s Business Daily’s Washington bureau chief, is author of “The Great American Bank Robbery: The Unauthoriz­ed Report About What Really Caused The Great Recession.” PAUL SPERRY

W ALL Street might be shocked to learn it is helping bankroll the antiTrump “resistance” movement that’s aggressive­ly fighting policies it favors — including corporate tax cuts and the repeal of Obama-era banking and health-care regulation­s.

The Obama administra­tion’s massive shakedown of Big Banks over the mortgage crisis included unpreceden­ted backdoor funding for dozens of Democratic activist groups who were not even victims of the crisis.

At least three liberal nonprofit organizati­ons the Justice Department approved to receive funds from multibilli­on-dollar mortgage settlement­s were instrument­al in killing the ObamaCare repeal bill and are now lobbying against GOP tax reform, as well as efforts to rein in illegal immigratio­n.

An estimated $640 million has been diverted into what critics say is an improper, if not unconstitu­tional, “slush fund” fed from government settlement­s with JPMorgan Chase and Co., Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp., according to congressio­nal sources.

The payola is potentiall­y earmarked for third-party interest groups approved by the Justice Department and HUD without requiring any proof of how the funds will be spent. Many of the recipients so far are radical leftist organizati­ons who solicited the settlement cash from the administra­tion even though they were not parties to the lawsuits, records show.

“During the Obama administra­tion, groups committed to ‘revolution­ary social change’ sent proposals and met with high-level HUD and Justice Department officials to try to get their pieces of the settlement pie,” Cause of Action Institute vice president Julie Smith told The Post.

Some of the chosen beneficiar­ies are now actively militating against the Trump administra­tion and its policies, including:

THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA: The Hispanicri­ghts group strenuousl­y protested the Republican-led “skinny” repeal of the Affordable Care Act after receiving at least $1.5 million from the Obama regime’s bank settlement funds, congressio­nal researcher­s say.

The notoriousl­y radical organizati­on, which advocates on behalf of illegal immigrants, argued the Trump proposal would have a “harmful impact” on the Hispanic community, including stripping potentiall­y “8 million Latinos” of medical coverage.

“The Latino community cannot afford a repeal of the ACA,” La Raza warned its members, while encouragin­g them to fight the legislatio­n in email alerts.

In July, the group held a large rally to protest the repeal effort in Arizona — GOP Sen. John McCain’s home state. The event is said to have influenced McCain’s decision to cast the deciding vote to kill the proposal.

La Raza has a long and checkered history of promoting illegal immigratio­n and advocating for welfare benefits and even driver’s licenses for undocument­ed Latino immigrants. Currently, it’s lobbying (under a new and less controvers­ial name, UnidosUS) against what it calls “the Trump administra­tion’s senseless and Draconian anti-immigrant policies,” fighting specifical­ly GOP bills “to fund [the] immoral border wall” with Mexico.

“President Trump has again chosen to appease the bigots in his base,” La Raza asserted in a statement posted on its website. “It’s time to translate injustice into action.”

During last year’s presidenti­al campaign, La Raza’s Chicago branch was among the groups that deployed thousands of protesters to the University of Illinois at Chicago, forcing then-candidate Trump to cancel a scheduled event there for safety reasons.

NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: After receiving at least $1.2 million from the bank-settlement slush fund, the African-American advocacy group solicited its supporters to oppose efforts to repeal ObamaCare by signing a letter to senators arguing “African-Americans stand to be disproport­ionately impacted.” It claimed more than 5 million black people would lose coverage under repeal legislatio­n.

NATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTME­NT COALI

TION: Since hauling in at least $2.6 million in funds under settlement in the Obama-era mortgage suits, the liberal housingrig­hts group has slammed tax-reform proposals by the Trump administra­tion as unfair, while trying to block efforts to privatize mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, claiming doing so would “deepen the racial wealth gap.”

NCRC is also actively lobbying against regulatory repeal of many provisions of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

The Washington-based group boasts more than 600 member organizati­ons who lobby lawmakers through list-serves, mailings, sign-on letters and conference calls. Though it’s assumed that funds distribute­d to such “qualified organizati­ons” will be used for housing assistance, the bank-settlement agreements do not enforce how the funds are spent.

“It stands to reason that some of the settlement funds have helped bankroll the resistance” bent on stopping the Trump agenda for America, Competitiv­e Enterprise Institute senior fellow John Berlau said.

It’s not clear how much money, in all, has been diverted from settlement funds to these and other left-wing organizati­ons. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has ordered a full audit of the funds while discontinu­ing the practice of funneling Justice Department settlement­s to third-party groups.

“Any settlement funds should go first to the victims and then to the American people [through the US Treasury] — not to bankroll third-party special interest groups or the political friends of whoever is in power,” Sessions said in a recent statement.

Still, The Post has learned that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau continues to force financial institutio­ns it prosecutes to donate to third-party community organizers.

CFPB director Richard Cordray is an Obama holdover, whose special five-year term doesn’t expire until 2018.

The Independen­t Community Bankers of America, a national voice for more than 5,700 large and small banks, said it opposes the government practice of providing back-door funding to unrelated groups.

“ICBA believes the funds should go towards affected victims,” a spokeswoma­n for the banking trade associatio­n told The Post.

 ?? ite os p m co t os P Y N ??
ite os p m co t os P Y N

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States