New York Post

BUM’S RUSH

Inept Mets front office strikes again

- mvaccaro@nypost.com MikeVaccar­o

L OOK, in this regard, sports is exactly the same as real life: There’s never an easy way to fire someone, or tell them their contract won’t be renewed — to tell them, no matter how the wording goes, that their services are no longer required.

It was uncomforta­ble to watch the Yankees part company with Joe Torre, who made the mistake of losing a first-round playoff series to the Indians in 2007, which happened to be the 12th straight season he had managed the Yankees to the postseason. It was grossly uncomforta­ble watching Tom Coughlin say goodbye to the Giants after two Super Bowl championsh­ips. It wasn’t easy to watch the Rangers fire John Tortorella, or to see the Nets can Lionel Hollins. The Knicks actually had security escort Don Chaney from the building on the night he was fired, which was awful because Chaney was as decent a man as there is.

You also can understand how sometimes there is a little satisfacti­on attached to a firing, if that employee has shown himself more than a little worthy of the ax. Phil Jackson hops to mind, of course. Billy Martin was fired a mind-boggling nine times — five by the Yankees alone — and almost every time you could tell that the owner or general manager who made that call took special relish in it. I mean, it was funny for Martin and George Steinbrenn­er to do that classic Miller Lite commercial where Steinbrenn­er fired Martin over a frosty mug of beer — “Again?!” was the punch line Martin delivered while cracking up laughing — but Steinbrenn­er probably found it less amusing when Martin called him “convicted” while drunk and on the record at O’Hare Airport, which led to his first Yankees terminatio­n.

So there’s really no blueprint involved. And let’s be perfectly honest: The way the relationsh­ip between the Mets and Terry Collins is staggering to the finish line is hard on the eyes and harder on the ears and maybe not the classiest way to han- dle something like this — but it isn’t even close to the worst way the Mets have bungled such an issue. Might barely make the top three, actually.

After all, the Mets really set the gold standard for such muddy divorces nine years ago when they allowed Willie Randolph — who had only had them two runs from the World Series two years earlier, who had never had a losing record — to fly all the way cross country on a Sunday, allowed him to manage a game at Anaheim on a Monday (a win, to boot) then whacked him in the first few minutes of a Tuesday (which was actually 3 o’clock in the morning back home).

And lest we forget the fate of Bobby Valentine in 2002: He was just two years removed from actually guiding the Mets to the Series, was a year removed from being one of the genuine civic heroes following 9/11, yet he was thrown under the bus, the curb and the street, forced to answer for a brutal roster assembled by Steve Phillips, and when Fred Wilpon delivered the news, Bobby Vee asked, incredulou­sly, “I’m fired but not Steve?”

So no, Terry Collins isn’t the first to get bounced around by the dysfunctio­nal mess that is Mets leadership, a no-account politburo of silent owners and decision makers who, we have learned this week, have mostly simmered at watching Collins’ work. (Though it may apparently be a genuine note-to-self moment for all future Mets managers: In the second year after you get in or near a World Series, wear a helmet and watch your back.) Still, what the men who run the Mets have done this week is puzzling at best and idiotic at worst. Because they either initi- ated or fell complicit with a whispering scheme meant to discredit Collins before dismissing him, and if they don’t know how unnecessar­y that is, then they are even blinder — and dumber — than we thought.

Collins is a better manager than he’s often been given credit for, but nobody will ever mistake him for Joe McCarthy — or Joe Maddon, for that matter. He was mostly given ready-to-fail rosters and he led those rosters exactly where they were destined to go — palookavil­le. Twice, he was given better than that and twice he found himself in the postseason. In many ways he is the definition of average: He neither made bad clubs substantia­lly worse nor made good teams substantia­lly better. He had some fierce supporters. He had some loud detractors.

This much is certain: If the Mets had announced two weeks ago that he wasn’t coming back next year, the reaction would have been muted, but mostly supportive. He probably would have gotten a warm ovation on Wednesday, his last day on the job at Citi Field. And that would have been that.

Instead, his final days are filled with whispers and worse, and maybe if you truly detested Collins’ work these past few years, that seems fair to you. But what the Mets have done is make even some of Collins’ detractors feel sorry for him. And with cause.

Every week it’s something else with this pathetic politburo. You wonder if they’ll ever really get it.

Or, worse, you already know the answer to that question.

 ?? Paul J. Bereswill ?? UH, THANKS? Terry Collins’ final few days with the Mets have been filled with negative stories.
Paul J. Bereswill UH, THANKS? Terry Collins’ final few days with the Mets have been filled with negative stories.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States