New York Post

Is the GOP Trying To Lose Its Majority?

- HUGH HEWITT Hugh Hewitt is the author of “The Fourth Way: The Conservati­ve Playbook for a Lasting GOP Majority.” Special To The Washington Post

It is simply inexplicab­le that any federalcou­rt vacancies could be left unfilled by a ’ year from Trump’ s inaugurati­on.

THE United States Courts, the third branch of government laid out in the Constituti­on, maintains a Web site that tracks vacancies among its 890 authorized judgeships. That site is continuall­y updated, but for conservati­ve supporters of President Trump most concerned with the judiciary — and they are legion — its scorecard doesn’t change often enough.

Judicial nomination­s and confirmati­ons are the key metric of success for the Trump “base,” and the greatest impediment to the president’s nominees is the so-called blue slip — the practice through which senators have near-veto power over judicial nominees from their home states.

But if the Senate’s “old guard” among the GOP needed anything more than the desire to see originalis­m return or to vindicate voters’ will to prod it to end, once and for all, the anti-constituti­onal use of the blue slip, former White House chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon has given them that push.

When Bannon declared war on the GOP’s Senate majority on Saturday at the Values Voter Summit, he was serving notice upon not just Republican incumbents up for reelection in 2018 but every Republican senator enamored of the privileges of the majority, that their indifferen­ce to party would rob some of their friends of their jobs and every member of the caucus of power.

“We have some of the most qualified people,” Trump declared in the White House Rose Garden on Monday, with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) at his side. “They’re waiting forever on line,” he continued. “It shouldn’t happen that way. It’s not right; it’s not fair.”

It is not remotely just or even close to “fair” to those nominees; nor is it “fair” for critics of the Senate GOP to lump McConnell in with the obstructio­nists. It was McConnell, after all, who saved the Supreme Court from a liberal majority through the refusal to hold any hearings for any nominee.

McConnell didn’t throw in with Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), John McCain (R-Ariz.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who at different junctures “saved” ObamaCare. All sophistry and talking points aside, ObamaCare is alive today because the Freedom Caucus in the House and these four senators destroyed first ObamaCare repeal’s momentum and then its chances at 50 votes in the Senate.

Bannon has a case to make against those legislator­s. But he is going to make it instead against establishm­ent DC, and there’s a good chance he will bring the house (and the House and Senate) down around him in doing so — and with it every foreseeabl­e future Supreme Court nominee.

While McConnell is doing what he can to avoid this, other Republican­s have failed to act like a party and free the GOP from the paralysis that has kept it from key goals, most importantl­y the effort to maintain even the semblance of originalis­m in the courts.

More than anyone else, Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), chair of the Judiciary Committee and the key defender of the blue slips, methodical­ly frustrates the one offering that establishm­ent DC can make to the conservati­ves in the countrysid­e.

The best GOP leader of the Sen- ate of my lifetime is now watching his old colleague toss the longsought majority on the political pyre because of a love of a tradition that is not even within the formal rules of the Senate.

It is simply inexplicab­le that any federal-court vacancies could be left unfilled by a year from Trump’s inaugurati­on. But that’s where we are headed, and proponents of the Bannon-fueled rejectioni­sm of GOP incumbents will rightly listen to no explanatio­n for this feebleness. Because there isn’t any.

If Senate Republican­s don’t want the majority, they are doing everything exactly right. If they do like their positions of authority, then burn the blue slips and stay in session until every judicial nominee has a hearing and a vote.

This isn’t complicate­d. Only the Beltway’s barons can make it so, and they will learn a very tough lesson in 13 months if they insist on business their way, and not the way of the framers.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States