New York Post

Give a damn, NYC!

-

FOLLOWING testimony from a felon that he bought Mayor de Blasio with donations, I asked New Yorkers a simple question: Do they care?

I got quick answers from three people. No, the public doesn’t care, they insisted. Did I mention that all three are elected liberals, one of whom is the mayor himself ?

De Blasio made his feelings clear when he told reporters to stop asking him about corruption and get on to the “real things” the public cares about. Presumably, he did not mean his undeniable success at increasing the homeless population and giving a free pass to public pissers.

Senators Chuck Schumer (top, inset) and Bernie Sanders, (bottom, inset) one a Democrat, the other a socialist, both made it clear they also don’t care about de Blasio’s corruption by endorsing him for a second term. “He’s answered questions on those issues,” Schumer told the press Monday. “I’m proud to endorse him.”

Actually, the mayor’s answers have been mostly of the I-don’trecall variety instead of outright denials. But that’s good enough for Schumer, a fact worth rememberin­g the next time the Senate minority leader accuses a presidenti­al nominee of being dirty.

A crooked pol is fine with Schumer, as long as he’s a Democrat. Party first, you know.

Sanders called de Blasio “one of the great progressiv­e leaders” in the country, though he ignored direct questions about corruption. His endorsemen­t says enough.

Voters will get their say next Tuesday, but there’s no doubt that Schumer, Sanders, controller Scott Stringer and other Dems are reading the polls. They think de Blasio is going to win, and they interpret that as meaning voters don’t care enough about corruption to fire him.

Of course, iff de Blasio had been indicted and was trailing inn the polls, Schumer and Sanders would havee kept their distance and Stringer would probably have challenged the mayor in the primary. Morality has nothing to do with it.

It’s a curious mind-set, and we see it openly advertised in both parties. My crook is better than your crook is an unspoken fact of political life, with selling out your office just another issue to be considered, like your position on taxes or abortion or education.

Voters who put integrity at the top of the list are a decided minority, so we really do get the government we deserve. Which, in the case of New York state and city, means some of the worst in America. A host of measuremen­ts, from the most corruption cases to the highest taxes to the highest Medicaid and education costs per capita, which yield slow job growth, poor health care and lousy education results, give New York a perpetual black eye and put it at a competitiv­e disadvanta­ge. And that’s without even mentioning the deteriorat­ing subways and street gridlock. How do the pols get away with it? Here are three top reasons. First, low voter turnout. In the 2014 gubernator­ial race, the state hit a new bottom in the modern era, with oonly 3.7 million votes cast, or jujust 34 percent of the 10.8 million people registered. The city is even worse. In the mayoral election in 2013, turnout was just 24 percent. In the recent mayoral primary, only 14 percent showed up. Think about that — 86 percent of registered Dems stayed home on election day. The city also reflects the second deficit of New York-style democracy — it’s a one-party town, with Dems holding a whopping near 7-1 registrati­on advantage. Although Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg won the mayoralty on the GOP line, along with other lines, Republican­s are usually invisible in citywide races. They hold no seats in Manhattan and, except for Staten Island and parts of Brooklyn, are not competitiv­e in most races.

Across much of the state, one party or another holds a virtual monopoly. Of 213 legislativ­e seats, as few as 15 are competitiv­e in any given year, meaning incumbents have a better chance of going to prison than being defeated in the general election. In some years, one-third of the seats, or about 70, go unconteste­d, meaning only one of the two major parties puts up a candidate.

The third feature — corruption — is the inevitable consequenc­e of low turnout and single-party rule. Our system is based on checks and balances but, in reality, it depends on a strong two-party system.

Without that, the party in power has almost unlimited power to make the laws, set the agenda and control the local courts. It’s practicall­y a license to steal, which many pols embrace.

These are the stakes next week. If de Blasio waltzes to victory despite his pay-to-play schemes, you can be certain his second term will be worse than his first.

After all, he will have gotten away with it and been proven right that voters don’t care about corruption.

Headline: Man, woman caught having sex on airplane. The story out of Detroit, where the plane landed, said the two were strangers until meeting on the flight from Los Angeles. “There are children,” one passenger told a reporter. “There are families. There are seniors. These things should be respected.” Respect? How quaint.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States