New York Post

No: It’d Paralyze Command

- RALPH PETERS

E ARLY in his presidency, Richard Nixon was impressed by the elaborate uniforms of ceremonial guards he encountere­d in Europe. So he ordered special outfits for the Secret Service guards protecting the White House. The result was a farce: comic-opera tunics and goofy helmets that belonged on stage at the Met.

Thoroughly un-American, the uniforms didn’t last.

Now, impressed by a French Bastille Day spectacle, President Trump wants a massive military parade of his own. It’s an idea as bad as Nixon’s but far more costly.

I don’t know a single veteran who thinks this big parade is a good idea. It doesn’t pay tribute to our troops but places yet another burden on them. And it’s as wrongheade­d as those Nixon get-ups.

Displays of military might have great appeal to those who’ve never served. And parades with miles of tanks, artillery pieces and missiles, along with massive formations of roboticall­y drilled soldiers, produce impressive images. But the strength’s an illusion.

Whenever our adversarie­s, be they in Moscow, Beijing or Pyongyang, stage extravagan­t military parades, it makes me smile: I know that those perfect ranks smashing down their boots aren’t prepared to fight: If your priority is big parades, you’re not prepared for big wars.

As for honoring the troops, as a former private I assure you soldiers don’t take any special joy in standing in the sun for hours while the VIPs suck mimosas in the shade.

If we want to honor our troops, pass the damned defense budget.

And don’t take our already over-scheduled troops away from critical training or their families for frivolity. Not only would the sort of grand parade Trump envisions tie up tens of thousands of troops, it would paralyze staffs and logistics commands for months, play havoc with vital training and grossly misuse assets.

Of course, we’ve had big parades in the past — and worthy ones. But they weren’t displays of power but rather put our troops front and center.

Our largest parades oc- curred at the close of the Civil War, when the Union’s battered-but-victorious Army of the Potomac marched through the streets of Washington, followed a bit later by Sherman’s legions — whose soldiers took special pride in their ragged uniforms.

Those were hard-earned celebratio­ns, as were the parades at the end of the World Wars and after Des- ert Storm. In every case, though, the primary focus was on the heroes; the hardware was secondary.

Our military — active duty, Reserves and National Guard — already contribute­s contingent­s to many events, from honor guards to hometown parades on Memorial Day. But those appearance­s are about those who serve us, our neighbors in uniform, not their armaments.

We even have dedicated ceremonial units garrisoned in the Washington area to serve the president for special events, such as inaugurati­ons or hosting state visits. And the Army’s Third Infantry Regiment, the “Old Guard,” can put on an impressive display on the South Lawn of the White House any time the president gets a hankering.

But the Old Guard doesn’t have tanks or missiles. Its handful of light artillery pieces only fires salutes. And its most important vehicles are horsedrawn caissons that bear the remains of our dead to Arlington Cemetery.

We even have aerobatic teams that stage overflight­s on holidays or at major sporting events — they’re recruiting tools. And New York City gets Fleet Week.

How much pomp and circumstan­ce do we need?

The purpose of our military is to fight. Not to engage in social experiment­s, Obama-style, and not to stage Las Vegas-meetsMosco­w spectacula­rs.

Surely, the money could be better used elsewhere. Plenty of vets still need health care. Maneuver battalions could use more training funds. Aircraft need spare parts, ships need repairs.

And if, having served in uniform for over two decades, I may be allowed a personal note, I just don’t like the image of tanks in our streets, no matter the reason. Our military exists to keep tanks out of our streets.

If the president wants a big parade, I suggest he invite high-school bands from around the country. They’d love to march down Pennsylvan­ia Avenue. And it wouldn’t take a single soldier away from preparing for war.

Ralph Peters is a retired soldier who loves parades, as long as he isn’t in them.

Don’ t take our already overschedu­led troops away from critical ’ training or their families for frivolity.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States