New York Post

Save the VA From Itself

How new secretary can beat the bureaucrac­y

- BETSY McCAUGHEY Betsy McCaughey is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research.

SINCE President Trump ousted Veterans Administra­tion Secretary David Shulkin, the question reverberat­ing in Washington is whether Trump’s new pick, Admiral Ronny Jackson, is capable of heading a department with 360,000 employees and 9 million vets under its care. Senate Democrats carp he lacks experience running “a complex organizati­on.”

Experience is overrated. President Obama’s VA secretary, Robert McDonald, failed miserably, despite having run Procter & Gamble. Vets died on phony wait lists on McDonald’s watch.

Jackson’s last combat role was with a Surgical Shock Trauma unit in Iraq. Sounds like good preparatio­n for battling the bureaucrac­y.

Jackson also shares Trump’s vision of putting vets in the driver’s seat about their own medical care. Here’s what Jackson can learn from his predecesso­rs’ failures. Make vets the priority, not protecting the VA bureaucrac­y. Shulkin refused to do that. Trump has pledged to fix the CHOICE program so vets can see private doctors when they decide it’s necessary. CHOICE was created in 2014 after revelation­s that sick vets were dying on wait lists at VA hospitals. CHOICE is supposed to allow vets to get private care if they live far from a VA facility or have waited too long.

But CHOICE’s red tape makes seeing an outside doctor almost impossible. That’s deliberate. Sen. Bernie Sanders, who co-authored legislatio­n that set up the system, relies on union campaign contributi­ons and is clearly most interested in protecting union jobs at the VA. That means keeping vets there.

Shulkin was part of that racket, too. He misled Trump and Congress with double talk about reforming CHOICE “in a way that will work for veterans and work for VA.” But protecting VA bureaucrac­y shouldn’t be a considerat­ion when vets’ lives are at stake.

Shulkin showed his true colors when Congress passed last month’s big spending package. Trump and congressio­nal Republican­s had

pushed hard to include reforms helping vets see outside doctors.

But the key person to sell this to Congress was Shulkin, and he equivocate­d, allowing Democrats to block its passage. It was a setback for Trump and vets. No wonder Shulkin was canned days later. Cut wait times in half.

Shulkin claimed success reducing waits, but that’s questionab­le. VA bureaucrat­s are still fudging the numbers, according to the inspector general.

Here’s a remedy. A whopping 47 percent of VA health-care users are 65 or older. They need angioplast­y and bypass surgery like other seniors. They use the VA to avoid Medicare’s out-of-pocket expenses, because their median annual income is only $24,000.

Picking up their copays would cost very little and encourage them to use Medicare. Bingo, it would cut VA wait times by nearly half, making room for younger vets to get combat-related care only the VA can provide.

Don’t count on VA bureaucrat­s to fess up when things go wrong.

Jackson should use unannounce­d audits to uncover dangerous conditions at medical facilities, instead of trusting officials to report them up the chain of command.

An inspector general’s report last month exposed “a breakdown of core services” at medical centers under Shulkin’s command. At the Washington, DC, facility under Shulkin’s nose, patients were needlessly overexpose­d to anesthesia due to inventory mismanagem­ent. After patients were put under, surgeons sometimes discovered they were out of equipment and had to race across the street to borrow it from another hospital or reschedule the procedure.

Shulkin claims he could “not recall” ever being notified of such problems. He expected to be notified?

Pundits are predicting a confirmati­on battle. The smart money should be on Jackson. He’s combat tested. Disregard the partisan drivel about his lack of experience running a big organizati­on. It’s coming from the same people who had no problem making a community organizer the president.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States