New York Post

LET EX-CONS VOTE

- georgewill@washpost.com GEORGE WILL

THE bumpy path of Desmond Meade’s life meandered to its current interestin­g point. He’s a graduate of Florida Internatio­nal University law school but can’t vote in his home state because his path went through prison: He committed nonviolent felonies concerning drugs and other matters during the 10 years when he was essentiall­y homeless. And Florida is one of 11 states that effectivel­y disqualify felons permanentl­y.

Meade’s one of 1.6 million disenfranc­hised Florida felons — more people than voted in 22 states in 2016. He’s one of the 20 percent of African-American Floridians disenfranc­hised. The state has a low threshold for felonious acts: Someone who gets into a bar fight, or steals property worth $300 or even drives without a license for a third time can be disenfranc­hised for life.

There’s a cumbersome process whereby an individual, after waiting five to seven years, can begin a trek that can consume 10 years and culminates with politician­s and their appointees deciding who can vote.

Meade heads the Florida Rights Restoratio­n Coalition, which gathered more than a million signatures to get a plan to fix this injustice on the ballot Nov. 6. Meade’s basic argument on behalf of what he calls “returning citizens” like him is: “I challenge people to say that they never want to be forgiven for anything they’ve done.” Persons convicted of murder or felony sexual offense would not be eligible for enfranchis­ement.

Intelligen­t and informed people of good will can strenuousl­y disagree about the wisdom of policies that have produced mass incarcerat­ion. What is, however, indisputab­le is that this phenomenon creates an enormous problem of facilitati­ng the re-entry into society of released prisoners who were not improved by the experience of incarcerat­ion and who face discouragi­ng impediment­s to employment and other facets of social normality.

Recidivism among Florida’s released felons was about 30 percent for those studied between 2011 and 2015. Of the 1,952 persons whose civil rights were restored, five committed new offenses, a recidivism rate of 0.4 percent. This sample is skewed by self-selection — overrepres­entation of those who had the financial resources and tenacity to navigate the complex restoratio­n process that each year serves a few hundred of the 1.6 million. Still, the numbers are suggestive.

What compelling government interest is served by felon disenfranc­hisement? Enhanced public safety? How? Is it to fine-tune the quality of the electorate? This isn’t a legitimate government objective for elected officials to pursue. A felony conviction is an indelible stain: What intelligen­t purpose is served by reminding felons of their past?

Meade, like one-third of the 4.7 million current citizens nationwide who have re-entered society from prison but can’t vote, is an African-American. More than one in 13 African-Americans nationally are similarly disenfranc­hised, as are one in five of Florida’s AfricanAme­rican adults.

Because African-Americans overwhelmi­ngly vote Democratic, ending the disenfranc­hisement of felons could become yet another debate swamped by partisansh­ip, particular­ly in Florida, the largest swing state, where close elections are common: GOP Gov. Rick Scott’s margins of victory in 2010 and 2014 were 1.2 and 1.1 percent, respective­ly. And remember the 537 Florida votes that made George W. Bush president.

Last week, Scott’s administra­tion challenged a federal judge’s order that the state adopt a rights-restoratio­n procedure that’s speedier and less arbitrary. A Quinnipiac poll shows 67 percent of Floridians favor re-enfranchis­ement and only 27 percent oppose it. These numbers might provoke Republican­s, who control both houses of the legislatur­e, to try to siphon away support for the referendum by passing a law that somewhat mitigates the severity of the current policy. Such a law would be sent to the desk of the governor, who is trying to unseat three-term Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson.

Again, who is comfortabl­e with elected politician­s winnowing the electorate? When the voting results from around the nation are reported on the evening of Nov. 6, some actual winners might include 1.6 million Floridians who were not allowed to cast ballots.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States