New York Post

The changing face — and figure — of Barbie

How an American doll played catch up with women’s changing roles in society

- RAQUEL LANERI

FROM the moment she was introduced in 1959, Barbie proved controvers­ial. Her creator, a feisty California businesswo­man named Ruth Handler, based the toy on a German sex doll named Lilli. Her husband, with whom she ran Mattel, then a doll-furniture company, thought she was crazy. Parents saw the figurine’s shapely proportion­s, which in real life would have measured a fantastica­l 36-18-38, and moaned that they were made for men, not little girls, and said Barbie was immoral. Girls loved her nonetheles­s. Mattel sold 300,000 in her first year. And despite the cartoonish proportion­s, the doll came to represent not pornograph­ic male fantasies but female empowermen­t. “Before Barbie, pretty much the only dolls that were available at that time were baby dolls — because most women at that time only became moms,” said Cindy Eagan, author of “The Story of Barbie and the Woman WhoCreated Her.” With Barbie, girls could play-act their futures, not as mothers but as career gals. “The message of Barbie and her parapherna­lia was very much the message of Helen Gurley Brown’s 1962 book ‘Sex and the Single Girl,’” M.G. Lord, author of “Forever Barbie,” told The Post. “She encouraged girls’ not just sexual autonomy but financial autonomy, because from the get-go she always came with some sort of equipment for earning a living.” Early “equipment” included tweed skirt suits, geek-chic glasses, sturdy clutches and — by 1965 — an astronaut’s helmet. Handler did reluctantl­y introduce boyfriend Ken in 1961 but made him as anodyne as possible: a disposable accessory to Barbie’s already-full life. “She was a proto-feminist,” said Lord. But as the new movie, “Tiny Shoulders: Rethinking Barbie,” now streaming on Hulu, points out, Barbie’s body image has lagged behind her career pursuits. Originally, her impossibly tiny waist and bodacious bosom echoed the Christian Dior hourglass silhouette­s that dominated 1950s fashion. But even as her clothes and hair changed with the times, her Playmate figure stubbornly remained. “Barbie is [and has been] a reflection of her time,” said Andrea Nevins, director of “Tiny Shoulders.” Take 1965’s Slumber Party Barbie, who came with a bubblegump­ink night robe, a bathroom scale permanentl­y set at 110 pounds and a diet book titled “How to Lose Weight” (the flip side offered a two-word prescripti­on: “Don’t eat”). In 1971, Barbie went through her first radical cosmetic change: Her eyes, at first demurely cast down, now looked straight ahead. Unfortunat­ely, that same year her breasts actually got bigger — but moms seemingly revolted. In 1972, sales of

[Barbie makers Mattel] were afraid of messing with the formula. — author M.G. Lord

Barbie declined for the first time since her introducti­on.

“The movement against her began during the women’s movement,” said Nevins. “This very static version of femininity [that Barbie represente­d] became something that feminists felt was holding them back.”

Barbie introduced at least a degree of diversity before many other toys. Her black friend, Christie, was introduced in 1968, and the first African-American Barbie arrived in 1980. And yet her proportion­s remained unrealisti­c. Even when a workout Barbie was added in the ’80s, her body retained its absurd shape.

“Theywere afraid of messing with the formula,” said Lord.

After decades of tiny tweaks — including a breast reduction and waist expansion in 2004 — Barbie now comes in a variety of skin tones and sizes. In 2016, Mattel launched tall, petite and curvy versions. But there are still missteps. When the company debuted its line of Inspiring Women Barbies on March 8— Internatio­nal Women’s Day — social media flared up over a Frida Kahlo doll that failed to include the artist’s signature unibrow and one based on boxer Nicola Adams that boasted woefully, comically waifish arms.

Still, Barbie has proved her adaptabili­ty time and time again — global sales of the doll were up 24 percent in the first quarter of 2018.

Perhaps, said Eagan, it’s time to cut her a break.

“Like many successful women, Barbie has had like 150 careers and done so much,” she said. “But we’re still talking about her looks.” Barbie’s figure has changed throughout the decades. Great Shape Barbie (far left), from 1983, had an even more exaggerate­d hourglass than the 1959 original. In 2004, Barbie got a more athletic, youthful appearance, with a smaller chest and wider waist (left). Now, Barbie comes in more varied shapes and sizes. In 2016, Mattel introduced Curvy Barbie (right), featuring wider hips and — gasp — no thigh gap.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States