New York Post

TITLE TOWNS

Warriors take place among dynasties

- mvaccaro@nypost.com MikeVaccar­o

CONTRARY to popular belief, there are positives to turning 50. For one thing, it beats the alternativ­e. For another, when you want to compile a list ranking things that happened “in my lifetime,” there is a scintilla more gravitas attached when you’re talking about a half century as opposed to, say, 18 years.

Since the Warriors on Friday night officially qualified for what I consider an actual sports dynasty — at least three titles in a fouryear period — it seems a perfect time to take a look at the best sports dynasties of my lifetime, which, if we are being technical, is actually about 51 ½ years, from Jan. 1, 1967, on.

It seems especially relevant since we are in a time when it is supposed to be harder and harder to build said dynasties. And yet here we are. And so here we go: the best of the 11 dynasties in my lifetime, not counting the 1965-67 Packers, since most of that happened before my lifetime (Dissenting voices not only welcome, but demanded): 1. Yankees (1996, 1998-2000): Extra credit offered here, because baseball postseason can be such a crapshoot and I am perfectly willing to state we will never see another baseball team win four out of five. It still seems remarkable that even a team as skilled and savvy as these Yankees could do this, especially the three-in-a-row, since that involved winning nine consecutiv­e playoff series (which they actually extended to 11 before Luis Bleeping Gonzalez). 2A & 2B. Bulls (1991-93;

1996-98): As remarkable as the first Jordan-led three-peat team was, the second was even more amazing since it included the 72-win team of 1995-96, and it also had the remarkable Hall of Fame triumvirat­e of Michael-Scottie Pippen-Dennis Rodman. And by the time that run was done, it was already clear what we were watching in Michael Jordan. It was like watching living history.

3. Islanders (1980-83): If a dynasty could be underrated, this one qualifies because of the sport and the location. But if you happened to follow these teams every day — and it is one of the fortunate breaks of my life that I did, as a young fan — it made you wonder why so many people looked so miserable caring about sports because rooting for the Islanders was so much fun.

4. Cowboys (1992-93, ’95): The pity (or the joy, if you are a Cowboys hater) is that, by rights, this should easily be four in a row if only Jimmy Johnson had stayed. Still, what the triplets of Troy Aikman, Emmitt Smith and Michael Irvin did was show the exact blueprint toward dominating a sport — assuming you pick the right players and hire the right coach.

5. Lakers (1985, ’87-88): Showtime was so good we didn’t need to wait 20 years to feel nostalgic for it. Even as Magic and Kareem and Worthy were doing their bit, we knew it was something we’d probably never see again. The Splash Brothers have come close. But close isn’t the same.

6. Athletics (1972-74): Even more underrated than the Islanders (just look where they are on this list), but when you ponder the vast assortment of talent and characters that ruled baseball with a green-and-gold fist for three solid years … they should be more celebrated than they are.

7. Oilers (1984-85, 1987-88): If fair is fair, they probably belong higher if for no other reason than a 1-2 punch of Wayne Gretzky and Mark Messier (even though that team was more of a 1-2-3-4-5-6-7 punch) deserves to be more celebrated. But it’s hockey and it’s Edmonton, so the same rules to the Islanders apply.

8. Warriors (2015, ’17-18): Maybe they deserve extra credit only because they’ve done this in a salarycap era and somehow got signifi- cantly better (thanks to Kevin Durant) during their run — and because they won 73 games in the year they didn’t win it all.

9. Lakers (2000-02): This might only be a personal bias, but since the first Lakers dynasty I think of is Magic/Kareem, I tend to give the Shaquille O’Neal/Kobe Bryant partnershi­p short shrift. Maybe I’ll feel differentl­y in a few years.

10. Patriots (2001, ’03-04): Would be higher but … well, we’ll always wonder how much illicit help they had, at least with the first one.

11. Canadiens (1976-79): If you take this list north of the border, it probably flips completely upside down. Most impressive thing about them: Habs were 16-3 in the four Cup finals series in this run.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States