New York Post

Royally bad makeover

- By SARA NATHAN on

Ever since she said “I do” to Prince Harry on May 19, Meghan Markle has been under pressure to adhere to royal protocol — and look good doing it.

But for the past six weeks, the new Duchess of Sussex’s fashion selections have come under fire: from her choice of sheer pantyhose to the tailoring of her dresses to her oversize pumps. Drawing particular ire was a blue and white Oscar de la Renta dress (inset, right) that she wore on June 17 to the wedding of Harry’s cousin. The Internet caught fire with incendiary criticisms of the $5,490 frock’s too-long sleeves and ill-fitting torso.

On Twitter, it was compared to both a sack of potatoes and the “Gone With the Wind” scenes where Scarlett O’Hara fashions a dress from curtains.

The public disappoint­ment with these perceived missteps may stem from the fact that the duchess is dealing with the pressures and expectatio­ns of her new role largely on her own.

Before the wedding, Meghan had a secret style weapon: her best friend, Jessica Mulroney. Now, it seems they’re not working together as closely, and it shows.

The Toronto-based profession­al stylist is credited with advising the then-actress on her wardrobe choices and introducin­g her to new designers. As a result, Meghan was praised for her casual, chic style, as she embraced hip Canadian labels such as Erdem. When she wore ripped Mother jeans, a white “boyfriend” shirt by Misha Nonoo and an Everlane tote for a date with Harry this past September, all three pieces saw an immediate sales spike.

But with Mulroney in Canada (where Meghan lived while starring on “Suits”) and the duchess, 36, in England, the new royal has been left to live up to the royal rules of decorum on her own.

“The royal family is a firm and the protocol is huge,” said British designer Caroline Castiglian­o. “We’re seeing everything about Meghan change. It’s very difficult when you’re 36 to do this — it’s far easier when you’re in your early 20s and they can mold and adapt you. It’s a much bigger job for Meghan. It must be unbelievab­ly difficult that Meghan was a working woman and had her own style.”

So it’s out with the ripped jeans and messy bun, in with the oh-somodest below-the-knee dresses. Goodbye to the casual totes and body-cross bags, hello to ladylike little clutches.

Gone is the Meghan who dared to wear a very sexy, sheer and metallic gown by Ralph and Russo for her engagement photos.

One of the biggest changes has been to her palette. Previously, Meghan wore plenty of bold hues: scarlet red, midnight blue, forest green, plus rich plaids and stripes. Now, she all but fades into the background in white, cream and the palest of pinks. Royal watchers say the wallflower look is in deference to Queen Elizabeth, to whom the duchess has been seen cozying up to at recent public events.

“If you’re going to be seen with the queen, who wears bright colors, then this neutral palette she’s been sticking to is really a measure of respect,” said Castiglian­o. “This much more demure, classic look is absolutely right on key to what she needs to fit in with the family.”

“At events with the queen, she lets Her Majesty shine,” said William Hanson, an expert on proper British etiquette. “The queen is top of the bill. Meghan is the bill, not top of tthe bill.”

With Mulroney back in Torronto, it seems Meghan has someone else guiding her, at least a bit.

“At the moment, she’s really dressing like Kate,” Castiglian­o said of Meghan’s sister-inlaw, the Duchess of Cambbridge. “At this stage, Kate is probably giving her tons of advice on how to fit in.”

Sources say that Kate’s assisttant, Natasha Archer, has been ccalling in clothes from designeers for Meghan until she hires an assistant of her own.

One big difference, one source pointed out, is that Kate’s clothes “fit her like a glove” because all the designers know her sizing, while Meghan is still developing her relationsh­ips.

Internet critics cluck that the clothes have too often been unflatteri­ng: frumpy waistlines, too-long sleeves, hems that hit at an odd point on her calves and a series of hats and fascinator­s that seem to age her. The wags even latched on to Meghan’s shoes appearing to be too big and gaping at the heel and toe.

As it turns out, there’s a good reason why. Fashion expert Harriet Davey told the Sun this week that “celebs often go a size up, or even two, in the shoe department when they’re at an event or on the red-carpet . . . to avoid blisters.”

According to Hanson, Meghan will almost certainly have to find a stylist soon: “I believe that the Duchess of Cambridge did not have a stylist at first and very much said, ‘I’m going to do this myself,’ but soon realized she needed some help. I believe Catherine now has a stylist, at least part time, and that’s highly likely what will happen for Meghan.

“[She] has a big tour in Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Tonga later this year and will need help,” he added. “In five months, Meghan won’t be making these minor mistakes.”

Castiglian­o agrees. In fact, she predicts that the duchess will slowly make a return to the stylish, youthful Meghan with whom the public first fell in love.

“Over the next year, Meghan will have more designers throwing themselves at her, and she will adapt her style,” she said. “It will be fabulous when she takes everything she learns and ‘Meghan-izes’ it.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? BEFORE & AFTER: Prior to marrying Prince Harry, Meghan Markle wore youthful shorts (left) and fun prints. In the six weeks since, she’s turned to pale, ill-fitting frocks (right and inset) and frumpy hats that seem to age the 36year-old duchess.
BEFORE & AFTER: Prior to marrying Prince Harry, Meghan Markle wore youthful shorts (left) and fun prints. In the six weeks since, she’s turned to pale, ill-fitting frocks (right and inset) and frumpy hats that seem to age the 36year-old duchess.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States