New York Post

Boosting Faith in the NYPD

-

One of the most scrutinize­d police forces in America— the NYPD— is facing yet more-oversight: An outside panel is launching a 120-day review of the department’s discipline policies. This time, for a change, it’s warranted. The task force, made up of former federal prosecutor­s Mary Jo White and Robert Capers and exfederal judge Barbara Jones, will check the cops’ procedures for punishing officer misconduct, with an eye on their consistenc­y and transparen­cy. And note: The department itself, to its credit, called for the review.

Why is it needed? Because it’s critical that the public be assured that wrongdoing by police officers is punished, consistent­ly and appropriat­ely. And New Yorkers need to know that in specific cases.

Yet that doesn’t happen now: In 2016, the city stopped releasing informatio­n about disciplina­ry action against specific officers, citing a state civilright­s law. Bad idea.

As City Council Public Safety Committee Chairman Donovan Richards notes, a lack of transparen­cy sows distrust. It also gives the department’s many eager-to-criticize enemies more ammo.

The NYPD disciplina­ry system is “broken and dysfunctio­nal, and [that] has served to protect abusive cops rather than the public,” Communitie­s United for Police Reform charged.

Fact is, critics will never stop badgering the department and looking for new areas to criticize, all in the hopes of tying its hands as it attempts to enforce the law.

Remember, cops already must answer to an independen­t monitor; an independen­t inspector general; the Civilian Complaint Review Board; periodic task forces; local, state and federal prosecutor­s and City Council committees, among others.

They’ve been accused — even by their own boss, Mayor de Blasio — of racism and bashed for stopping suspicious characters, using excessive force, even keeping a database on gangs. Most times, the criticisms prove to be unfounded.

But if top brass are handling police-punishment procedures properly, they have nothing to hide. And the review will sort that out.

Once it does, maybe the department’s foes will finally give their criticism a rest.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States