New York Post

So She Won’t Testify

-

It turns out that Christine Blasey Ford actually isn’t “willing to do whatever it takes to get her story forth,” after all. Her preconditi­ons for testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee include a demand for “a full investigat­ion by law-enforcemen­t officials” — specifical­ly, the FBI. That’s completely outrageous. The committee should proceed as scheduled with next Monday’s hearing. If she shows, or makes arrangemen­ts to testify behind closed doors or to committee staffers, fine. If not, it’s time to vote.

Would an FBI investigat­ion change her testimony? For that matter, would Democrats even accept a probe that — as with Anita Hill’s accusation­s against Clarence Thomas — couldn’t confirm her allegation?

The FBI is declining to investigat­e because no federal crime has been alleged (as it was in the Thomas-Hill case) and be- cause that’s not the Bureau’s job in a confirmati­on process.

Besides, as Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley notes, “If Senate Dems think they need the FBI to investigat­e, why didn’t they alert the FBI on July 30,” when Sen. Dianne Feinstein learned of Ford’s allegation?

Fact is, Feinstein (while claiming she was only respecting Ford’s request for anonymity) sat on this until Democrats desperatel­y needed something — anything — to sidetrack Kavanaugh’s confirmati­on.

Republican­s led by Grassley have treated Ford with the utmost courtesy and respect and bent over backward to accommodat­e her (supposed) wish to be heard.

But that doesn’t extend to agreeing to a process that’s plainly meant to halt any vote till past November or even 2020. Ford has been offered her choice of forums: If she won’t use any of them, let’s move forward.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States