New York Post

Dems’ Lost Heritage

RFK preached a politics of love

- HugH Hewitt

IN the aftermath of the murder of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, then a candidate for president, went forward with a planned rally at 17th and Broadway in the heart of Indianapol­is’ African-American community.

The country had witnessed more than 100 race riots that left at least 83 dead and 1,800 injured the previous summer, and Kennedy knew that news of King’s assassinat­ion could result in similar violence. Instead, he called for “an effort to understand with compassion and love.”

Kennedy’s speech is rightfully hailed as one of the great moments of American political rhetoric. His plea was tragically not successful: More than 40 were killed and 2,500 injured in the riots that followed.

The Democratic Convention in Chicago was a long clash between police and demonstrat­ors. The Weathermen began their “days of rage” in 1969. The Kent State shootings shocked the nation a

year later. Meanwhile, thousands of Americans died in Vietnam: 11,363 in 1967, 16,899 in 1968, 11,780 in 1969 and 6,173 in 1970.

Neverthele­ss, Kennedy’s speech was a heartfelt, deeply moving appeal for healing and love among fellow citizens. Kennedy, who himself was killed two months later, saw all that had occurred, all that loomed, and tried to stop it. Read his speech from that night in Indianapol­is. Better yet, listen to it.

Then ask if you heard anything approachin­g that this past week from any corner of the Democratic Party. Kennedy was running for president as a Democrat but he was very much running against President Lyndon B. Johnson and the Vietnam War.

Still, he didn’t use the tragedy of King’s murder to score points. He didn’t demonize his opponents in the field, Hubert Humphrey and Eugene McCarthy, or his presumptiv­e opponent in the fall, Richard Nixon. He didn’t just speak to Democrats or some small slice of Democrats whom he considered “his base.” Kennedy spoke to all Americans, especially the deeply traumatize­d black community, and urged peace and love and healing.

The aftermath of the El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, mass murders, both rooted in the malaise and bigotry of our online age on both the fringe left and right, didn’t summon forth a Kennedy.

Every single Democrat missed his or her opportunit­y to step up, as Bobby Kennedy did, and instead stepped in it.

Indeed, almost all of the Democrats chose in the week following a weekend of horrors to pivot their main message of the campaign trail from “Trump and Russia” to “Trump and racism.” At least five of the Democratic candidates went so far as to brand President Trump as a white supremacis­t.

This is repulsive rhetoric — the sort of speech intended to marginaliz­e and exile. It is “basket of deplorable­s” on steroids, and it says to every Trump supporter: “You, too, are a white supremacis­t.”

I discussed the actual number of “white supremacis­ts” with Hillary Clinton on my radio show in November 2017.

“Of the 62.9 million people who voted for President Trump, do you have a number in your mind that you think are actually white nationalis­t racists of that 62.9 million, a real number?” I asked.

“I don’t think there are 100,000 in any given state. I don’t think there are a half million in the United States. Do you disagree with me? Do you think there are more than a half million, you know, honest-to-God white nationalis­ts running around the United States?”

“Probably not, no,” Clinton responded. “But I think there are people who are unfortunat­ely kind of reverting back to rather virulent attitudes about race in part because I think that it’s become ‘politicall­y acceptable,’ no longer politicall­y correct to try to overcome our own feelings that often block us from seeing each other as fellow human beings. So no, the hard-core people, I agree with you, I don’t think that is a very large number.” Clinton was right. I don’t believe Trump is a racist, much less a white supremacis­t. I think the rhetoric of the Democratic presidenti­al candidates is incendiary and dangerous — and also politicall­y self-destructiv­e. It is so absurd as to be laughable but for its repetition.

But they don’t wish to argue, debate and persuade. They wish to smear and exclude, and they have exploited this shock and fear to do so. They should turn back. They should follow the example of Bobby Kennedy, as should Trump. We could all listen to Kennedy’s plaintive words of 51 years ago to good effect.

 ??  ?? Upstander: Bobby Kennedy never used the turmoil of the 1960s to score cheap points against rivals or demonize vast swaths of the US population.
Upstander: Bobby Kennedy never used the turmoil of the 1960s to score cheap points against rivals or demonize vast swaths of the US population.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States