New York Post

Evidence of a problem

DNA clue in Tessa slay case ‘not conclusive’

- By TINA MOORE and REBECCA ROSENBERG Additional reporting by Craig McCarthy and Aaron Feis

A grand jury will soon weigh the case against two teen suspects in the murder of Tessa Majors — but what was once hoped to be the key evidence against them is actually far from conclusive, sources told The Post.

DNA testing ostensibly implicatin­g the 14-year-old boy suspected of fatally knifing the Barnard College freshman hasn’t yielded the outcome investigat­ors were looking for, sources said.

It shows a 1 million to 2 million likelihood ratio of the DNA being the teen’s, sources said — a far cry from the 5 billion figure investigat­ors prefer to have anchoring a murder case.

“That’s a very low match. That means some of the stabber’s DNA structure matches some of the DNA” recovered as evidence, said one NYPD insider. “The 1-2 million [figure] is not conclusive that the stabber is the one who left his DNA.”

Factors including exposure to the elements — and the DNA of others — can degrade the sample and cause lower likelihood ratios, the source explained.

Two other law-enforcemen­t sources concurred that the DNA evidence is not conclusive, and while authoritie­s still intend to present it for the considerat­ion of a grand jury, it will likely be less as a smoking gun and more as one facet of the case.

Still, a forensics expert argued that the results of the testing are hardly a death knell for the case.

“They want to say it’s unique,” Lawrence Kobilinsky, a professor of forensic science at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, said of the DNA and authoritie­s.

But “there are plenty of people convicted without a unique match. It’s nice if you’ve got 5 billion, but not needed.”

Majors, 18, was cutting through Morningsid­e Park in Manhattan on a dark December afternoon when she was cornered by three assailants, one of them waving a knife, authoritie­s have said.

The group tried to rob the aspiring journalist, but she fought back, chomping down on the armed attacker’s finger in their fatal struggle, sources have said.

There is no known footage of the attack, save for a grainy surveillan­ce video from a camera outside the park that rendered the run-in clear enough to convey the gist of what happened but not to reveal any faces.

There also were no known impartial eyewitness­es.

Zyairr Davis, 13, was the first to be charged in the case, accused by prosecutor­s in Family Court of felony murder.

He has purportedl­y admitted to playing a role in robbing Majors but has maintained that one of the two 14-year-old pals with him at the time plunged the knife into her, officials said.

As for those two teens, cops have brought each of them in for an interview but ultimately released them without charges.

The Post is withholdin­g their names.

A search warrant executed at home of the 14-year-old suspected of stabbing Majors yielded an empty plastic baggie like those commonly used by drug dealers, sources said.

Cops showed the baggie to a local pot peddler, who allegedly recalled selling it to Majors shortly before her murder, sources said.

When cops briefly detained the suspected stabber for questionin­g, he submitted to a cheek DNA swab, sources said.

But the sources now say that testing is inconclusi­ve.

It remains unclear what evidence, if any, may have been culled from a knife found in the park, which sources first indicated last week is the murder weapon.

Authoritie­s aren’t taking any chances, preparing a massive trove of evidence to take to a grand jury, sources have said.

“They feel they have enough evidence to get an indictment,” said an insider.

 ??  ?? ‘VERY LOW MATCH’: DNA evidence against the teen suspects (one above) in the Morningsid­e Park killing of Tessa Majors (right) isn’t the smoking gun prosecutor­s had hoped for, according to sources.
‘VERY LOW MATCH’: DNA evidence against the teen suspects (one above) in the Morningsid­e Park killing of Tessa Majors (right) isn’t the smoking gun prosecutor­s had hoped for, according to sources.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States