New York Post

Masks Aren’t Tyranny

- Jonah Goldberg Twitter: @JonahDispa­tch

ONE of the things I love about America is her deeply ingrained rebellious­ness. When the government tells us to do something, we instinctiv­ely question it.

Of course, all principles can be taken too far. It’s good to question authority, but if a sign says, “Do not swim in pond, there are alligators here,” and your response is, “I’ll do what I want, you’re not the boss of me,” you’re an idiot.

If you’re on a lifeboat with several other people and everyone agrees to ration the fresh water, but your answer is, “Shut up, I’m thirsty,” being the sole dissenter makes you the jerk, not the hero.

Which brings me to the newest form of fashionabl­e rebellion in some quarters: refusal to wear face masks when warranted.

Note the qualifier “when warranted.” I think mask-wearing can go overboard. In my neighborho­od in Washington, DC, I see joggers running alone on warm days wearing masks, and I wonder, “Why?” It’s gotta be uncomforta­ble. But when I’m in a grocery store, I wear the mask.

Bear in mind, the CDC’s recommenda­tion that people wear masks isn’t primarily about self-protection but the protection of others. There’s little to no evidence that a mask will prevent you from getting the disease if you’re exposed to it. There’s some evidence that if you’re infected with COVID-19, wearing a mask will help prevent you from spreading it. In other words, it’s a medically sound courtesy to others.

I don’t have any problem with President Trump not wearing a mask at his press conference­s. He’s tested regularly, as are the people around him. I think the TV reporters standing outside at the beach wearing a mask are being a little silly. The camera can easily be more than six feet away.

But the idea that public figures should model correct behavior isn’t ridiculous either. It’s a judgment call.

That said, what I find utterly baffling — and, frankly, embarrassi­ng — is the idea that wearing a mask in any situation is a surrender to tyranny and fear. Various cable TV and talk-radio hosts have embraced the idea that wearing a mask is a concession to tyrannical social engineers and a “symbol of fear,” in the words of Rush Limbaugh.

Protestors boo suggestion­s to wear masks and carry signs reading “Just Say No” and “Don’t Mask the Truth.” At one store in Michigan, a security guard was shot to death for telling a patron to wear a mask.

Cheryl Chumley of The Washington Times writes that the practice of mask-wearing is “like the red belts worn by the communists when they want to show solidarity, when they want to make public expression­s of party loyalty, when they want to display their sacrifice of self for the greater good.”

No. Wearing red belts to prove you’re a good communist is not at all like wearing a mask to ensure you won’t kill someone’s grandmothe­r — never mind simply to reassure said grandmothe­r it’s safe for her to shop at the supermarke­t.

According to any remotely recognizab­le theory of limited government, the government has not just the authority but the obligation to prevent threats to public welfare. From colonial times to well after the ratificati­on of the Constituti­on, government­s took extreme measures — quarantine­s, inoculatio­n programs, etc. — to prevent the spread of yellow fever and other epidemics.

During the Revolution­ary War, George Washington ordered the mandatory inoculatio­n of his troops to prevent the spread of smallpox.

In other words, epidemics, like wars, are the great exceptions to limited government. This used to be Conservati­sm 101: The government shouldn’t boss us around unless there is a truly compelling reason, like an invading army or, in this case, an invading virus.

What makes all of this even dumber is that all the federal government has done is recommend mask-wearing. Most of the places that require masks are private businesses. Admittedly, some are adhering to local public-health guidelines, but so what? Why aren’t these rebels going shirtless and shoeless into restaurant­s to stick it to the man and his Maoist “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service” signs?

By all means, continue to question authority, but bear in mind, sometimes the authoritie­s are right.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States