New York Post

NSA backs Don vs. NYT report

- By EBONY BOWDEN ebowden@nypost.com

Intelligen­ce officials say a news report about Russia paying the Taliban to kill US troops in Afghanista­n does not match “verifiable” Taliban activity and was never presented to President Trump because it was not deemed credible.

The National Security Agency reviewed the claims contained in The New York Times report but found it did “not match well establishe­d and verifiable Taliban and Haqqani practices,” according to reporting by CBS News’ senior investigat­ive correspond­ent Catherine Herridge, who tweeted that she spoke to an intelligen­ce official with direct knowledge on the matter.

The intelligen­ce report also lacked “sufficient reporting to corroborat­e any links” and because there were so many dissenting opinions over the allegation­s, the report only ever reached “low levels” of the White House’s National Security Council and was never flagged for Trump or Vice President Mike Pence.

Herridge’s reporting casts doubt on the Times report, which claimed US officials briefed Trump in March on Russia’s alleged scheme to pay Taliban militants to kill American forces in Afghanista­n in an attempt to expel them from the region.

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany denied these allegation­s Monday and said the president was never briefed because of dissenting opinions with the intelligen­ce community. She called the Times decision to report that he had been briefed “irresponsi­ble.”

“There’s no consensus within the intelligen­ce community and I would also note that for those of you that are always taking The New

York Times at their word, they erroneousl­y reported that the president was briefed on this,” McEnany told reporters.

“He was not briefed on this and neither was the vice president, so before buying into, full fledged, a narrative from The New York Times that falsely stated something about the president that you would wait for the facts to come out and note once again there’s no consensus in the intel community and, in fact, there are dissenting opinions from some within it,” she added, calling on the newspaper to give back its Pulitzer Prizes.

A senior intelligen­ce official confirmed the Russia-Taliban bounty allegation­s were never contained in the president’s daily briefing on highly classified security matters, Herridge wrote.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States