New York Post

ROB OF THE TITLE

-

IT WAS a hundred years ago this month that the 16 men who’d watched their sport, baseball, teeter on the brink of criminal extinction decided to create the commission­er’s office and hire a man named Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis.

From the start, Landis’ life had been a curious and quintessen­tially American tale. He was named for the Civil War battlefiel­d in Cobb County, Ga. — which actually had a second “n” in the name — where his father had lost a leg in 1864, fighting for the Union.

He was appointed to the federal bench by President Theodore Roosevelt, a fellow Republican progressiv­e, and though many of his higher profile verdicts were overturned on appeal, he was definitely colorful. Once, an elderly defendant pleaded with Landis that he would never live long enough to serve out the five-year prison term Landis had handed him.

“Do the best you can,” Landis replied.

As much as anything, what Landis brought to the job was one of the great scowls ever. It is rare to see a picture of Landis from those days in which he didn’t look like he was suffering from a terrible case of constipati­on. He could have been sitting on a sandy beach somewhere, sun on his face, feet in the ocean, cold beer in his hand, and he would wear a look like he had to ponder the meaning of life while eating gruel. This was one miserable-looking, one angry, one scowling cur of a man.

Which is just what baseball needed in November 1920. A season that had been ribboned with speculatio­n about the White Sox throwing the 1919 World Series had culminated with eight Sox players being indicted by a Chicago grand jury (though they never were convicted of anything). Public confidence in the sport was at an all-time low. Gamblers, and gambling, had long been intertwine­d with the game, but folks had long been willing to look the other way — but not now.

Now a World Series had been lost on purpose.

Baseball needed a man with a scowl.

So it turned to Landis. The owners handed him the store and he took it, ruling absolutely for the next quarter century. He wasn’t always a model of righteousn­ess — notably, he spent his entire commission­ership enabling the “gentleman’s agreement” that kept the sport lily white until afterft hihis death. He picked needless fights with his own stars, trying to impede Babe Ruth — the game’s top drawing card and the main reason his sport was resuscitat­ed from the darkness — from taking lucrative postseason barnstormi­ng trips. He ruled with an iron fist. He held grudges.

But the sport has never been more unified, for better or worse. It probably wasn’t only the Scowl. But the Scowl didn’t hurt. Folks were damn intimidate­d by the scowl.

Rob Manfred doesn’t have a scowl. I’m not sure he’s terribly proficient at knock-knock jokes, either, but he surely does not exude the same vibe his hundredyea­r antecedent did. But in some ways he occupies the office at a similar moment of truth as the one when Landis took over.

The nature of the game has changed. The office isn’t nearly what it used to be. The last commission­er to hold absolute power was Peter Ueberroth, and he lasted only one term. Fay Vincent tried to rule that way and never even made it to the end of his term.

The commission­er is hired by the owners — as Landis was — but he also must answer to them, as LaLandis never had to. But the issues ththat threaten the game — while nonot as immediatel­y ruinous as gagambling in 1920 — need answers anand resolution­s, the kind a good cocommissi­oner should be able to sosolve.

Landis certainly would have hhandled the Astros situation a littltle ... um, differentl­y. He never could have imagined arm wrestling with a strong players union. AAnd as we’ve mentioned, he wwasn’t exactly a social-justice pioneer. As it happens, he is usually looked at as the best commission­er in the first 100 years of the office, and if any honor was ever given by default, that one was for sure. So as amazing as it sounds, the title is there for Manfred, if he wants it, if he can seize it. Baseball could really use a commission­er about whom, 50 years from now, people could look back and say: Thank goodness he was the man in charge.

Manfred has the job. And now he has the challenge. The first few chapters haven’t been great, but they don’t have to define him. Can he grow into what baseball needs from a leader?

For baseball’s sake it is the only way to root.

 ??  ?? MikeVaccar­o
MikeVaccar­o

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States