New York Post

Giving away the ending

Early vote indicates Trump will be acquitted in impeachmen­t trial:

- By STEVEN NELSON and BRUCE GOLDING

CONSTITUTI­ONAL Everyone can see immediatel­y why this is so dangerous. It’s an invitation to the president to take his best shot at anything he may want to do on his way out the door, including using violent means to lock that door, to hang on to the Oval Office at all costs and to block the peaceful transfer of power.

— Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.)

Senate Republican­s sent a strong signal Tuesday that former President Donald Trump’s second impeachmen­t trial will end in acquittal, with an overwhelmi­ng majority of them voting that it’s unconstitu­tional.

Forty-four GOP members voted not to allow the trial to proceed after hearing about 3½ hours of arguments over whether lawmakers still have jurisdicti­on over Trump, who was succeeded by President Biden on Jan. 20.

The 56-44 vote marked the second time that Senate Republican­s voted overwhelmi­ngly against the constituti­onality of the impeachmen­t trial, with only Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) breaking ranks since a 55-45 vote last month, to make it now six Republican defectors.

The move makes it highly unlikely that 17 GOP senators will join Democrats to comprise the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump on a charge of “incitement of insurrecti­on” in the deadly Jan. 6 storming of the US Capitol by his supporters.

Despite Day One of the trial being ostensibly devoted to the constituti­onality question, lead House impeachmen­t manager Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) started the session with a lengthy video montage that mashed together chilling scenes from the riot and segments from the speech Trump gave his supporters earlier that day.

“That’s a high crime and misdemeano­r,” Raskin said after pointing to the screen.

“If that’s not an impeachabl­e offense, then there’s no such thing.”

Raskin went on to repeatedly argue that there’s no “January exception” to impeachmen­t, saying that the “vast majority of constituti­onal scholars” believe Trump can be tried despite having left office.

Raskin also got emotional while closing his remarks by recounting how he brought his family to the Capitol on Jan. 6 to watch Congress certify Biden’s victory, a day after the funeral for his son, Tommy, 25, who committed suicide on Dec. 31.

His daughter and son-in-law wound up barricaded in an office, Raskin said, “hiding under a desk” and thinking that “they were going to die.”

During the defense presentati­on, lead Trump impeachmen­t lawyer Bruce Castor said countless former government officials could be subjected to impeachmen­t proceeding­s if Trump’s trial went forward.

“If you go down the road Mr. Raskin asks you to go down, the floodgates will open,” Castor told the Senate.

“The political pendulum will shift one day. This chamber and the chamber across the way will change one day and partisan impeachmen­ts will become commonplac­e.”

Castor suggested politician­s could wind up being elected to Congress by campaignin­g on the promise of impeaching controvers­ial government figures, specifical­ly mentioning former Attorney General Eric Holder and the botched “Fast and Furious” gun-running probe.

Castor — who appeared to deliver his remarks off the cuff and rambled at times — also said “the idea of January amnesty is nonsense.”

NOT CONSTITUTI­ONAL

. . . an impeachmen­t trial of a private-citizen Trump held before the Senate would be nothing more nor less than the trial of a private citizen by a legislativ­e body. An impeachmen­t trial by the Senate of a private citizen violates Article I Section 9 of the United States Constituti­on, which provides that no bill of attainder shall be passed . . .

— Trump lawyer David Schoen

If Trump actually played a part in the Capitol riot, Castor said, “after he’s out of office, you go and arrest him.”

“The Department of Justice does know what to do with such people,” he said.

Castor noted that some of the people charged with breaking into the halls of Congress have been charged with conspiracy, but that “not a single one” has been charged with conspiring with Trump.

Another Trump lawyer, David Schoen, said trying Trump would “open up new and bigger wounds” and “tear this country apart, perhaps like we have only seen once before in our history.”

“A great many Americans see this process for exactly what it is: A chance by a group of partisan politician­s seeking to eliminate Donald Trump from the American political scene and seeking to disenfranc­hise 74 million-plus American voters and those who dare to share their political beliefs and vision of America,” he said.

“They hated the results of the 2016 election and want to use this impeachmen­t process to further their political agenda.”

Trump’s first trial last year, over a call in which he asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigat­e Joe Biden and his son Hunter, ended in acquittal, with Sen. Mitt Romney casting the only GOP vote to convict.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? UNDER FIRE: The second impeachmen­t trial of former President Donald Trump opened Tuesday in the Senate with House managers introducin­g video of the Jan. 6 US Capitol riot and siege that they accuse Trump of inciting.
UNDER FIRE: The second impeachmen­t trial of former President Donald Trump opened Tuesday in the Senate with House managers introducin­g video of the Jan. 6 US Capitol riot and siege that they accuse Trump of inciting.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States