New York Post

Wray missed Capitol threat

Didn’t read warning until after Jan. 6

- By STEVEN NELSON

FBI Director Christophe­r Wray admitted Tuesday he didn’t read his own agency’s report citing the threat of an attack on Congress until “days” after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

Wray told senators he didn’t see the warning — reportedly describing preparatio­ns for “war” — until after the violence that disrupted certificat­ion of President Biden’s victory.

“Well, senator, I think the intelligen­ce or the informatio­n you’re asking about is the much-discussed Norfolk SIR, or situationa­l informatio­n report,” Wray said at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. “I didn’t see that report, which was unverified intelligen­ce, until some number of days after the 6th.”

But Wray repeatedly defended the FBI’s handling of the intelligen­ce, which he said was passed from the bureau’s Norfolk field office to Washington-area police forces on Jan. 5.

“That raw, unverified informatio­n was passed within I think 40 minutes to an hour to our partners, including the Capitol Police, including Metro PD and not one, not two, but three different ways, one e-mail, one verbal and one through the lawenforce­ment portal,” Wray said.

The FBI was among the federal agencies that sent employees to restore order at the Capitol on the evening of Jan. 6 after windows and doors were smashed in, as the Norfolk report had warned was possible.

The degree of planning for the riot remains murky. Video analysis by The Wall Street Journal identified members of the right-wing Proud Boys group as being among the vanguard, including breaching a police perimeter while then-President Donald

Trump was still speaking to supporters near the White House.

Wray told senators that “surely there were aspects of it that were planned and coordinate­d.”

Describing the Norfolk memo, Wray said, “My understand­ing is that this was informatio­n posted online under a moniker or a pseudonym. It was unvetted, uncorrobor­ated informatio­n, but it was — and it was somewhat aspiration­al in nature — but it was concerning. It was concerning and it was specific enough that we, our folks in Norfolk, thought they need to get it out even if we hadn’t had a chance to corroborat­e or vet it.”

Wray repeated that the FBI passed along the informatio­n.

“The e-mail [from the FBI] itself, went to, I think there may be as many as five Capitol Police Task Force officers on the Joint Terrorism Task

Force,” Wray said. “And the whole point of the Joint Terrorism Task Force is for the chosen representa­tives of the partner agency to be there in the loop real-time so that everybody’s got the same informatio­n so that each agency can use that informatio­n to do what it needs to do. But in addition to the e-mail — so belt and suspenders — it was verbally briefed.

“And then third, in addition to that, it was put into the LEEP, the law-enforcemen­t portal, to make sure everybody got it. But having said that, I do not consider what happened on January 6 to be an acceptable result. And that’s why we were looking so hard and figuring out how can the process be improved.”

Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who resigned after the riot, previously testified to Congress that he was not briefed on the FBI warning by his subordinat­es.

 ??  ?? FB-AY-YI-YI: FBI Director Christophe­r Wray testifies Tuesday on Capitol Hill, telling senators he did not read his agency’s report warning about the imminent attack until days after the siege..
FB-AY-YI-YI: FBI Director Christophe­r Wray testifies Tuesday on Capitol Hill, telling senators he did not read his agency’s report warning about the imminent attack until days after the siege..

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States