New York Post

Birds, bees for tykes?

Dem pol: 5-yr.-olds should have sex ed

- By MARY KAY LINGE Additional reporting by Susan Edelman and Dana Kennedy

Get ready for the latest woke wave in education: comprehens­ive sex ed for kids as young as 5 — thanks to a new bill in the state Senate.

Legislatio­n sponsored by state Sen. Samra G. Brouk, a freshman Democrat from Rochester, would tie New York’s health curriculum to standards written by a left-wing interest group that advocates “Sex Ed for Social Change” and would make those lessons mandatory statewide. Under that group’s current standards, public and charter schools would have to teach 5- year-olds about“gender identity” and in struct 8- year old son hormone blockers to prevent puberty in trans gender identifyin­g preteens.

Kids as young as 11 would get lectures on “vaginal, oral and anal sex”; study “queer, two-spirit, asexual, pansexual” and other gender identities; and receive explicit instructio­n on the use of external and internal condoms, dental dams and other contracept­ives.

Brouk told The Post, “I am greatly concerned about the unacceptab­ly high incidence of relationsh­ip violence, sexual harassment and assault and online bullying in our society today. We must equip the next generation with the skills and education they will need to thrive.”

But her proposal would legally link New York’s schools to the shifting recommenda­tions of the Sexuality Informatio­n and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS).

“We would be outsourcin­g our curriculum to this outside organizati­on,” said Assemblyma­n Michael Reilly (R-SI), a member of the education committee. “That’s a concern.”

Some parents are also worried. “The state constituti­on guarantees a basic education, but nowhere does it say ‘we have to prepare our kids to change their sex if they want to,’ ” said Sam Pirozzolo of the New York City Parents Union. “We have schools where 95 percent of kids can’t read or do math at grade level, and now they want to bring in these complicate­d social-justice issues? That’s BS.”

Even parents who approve of sex ed in school are queasy about the envelope-pushing topics the law would require.

“It’s inappropri­ate,” said Ken Jewell, a Manhattan family law attorney whose two children attend New York City public elementary schools. “These are things kids that age are not capable of comprehend­ing yet.”

Jewell favors early-grade instructio­n on personal space and pedophilia protection but thinks Brouk’s measure goes too far.

“As a dad I want my kid armed enough to know if something is wrong,” he said. “But I don’t want to put knowledge in their heads that takes away the innocence of childhood.”

A recent study by Montclair State University professors boosted early sex education as a way of preventing child sex abuse and, later, partner violence.

“I am in love with the SEICUS standards,” declared child psychologi­st Dr. Kelly Rabenstein Donohoe.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? WOKE-UP CALL: Scenes like this might be a reality if a New York state lawmaker’s sex-ed bill passes.
WOKE-UP CALL: Scenes like this might be a reality if a New York state lawmaker’s sex-ed bill passes.
 ??  ?? BROUK
BROUK

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States