LEGAL HANDS TIED
Hard to prove spa-slay 'hate'
The Atlanta spa shootings may not meet the standard for federal hate-crime charges, authorities said Saturday.
Seven of the eight victims in Tuesday’s attacks on three massage parlors in the Atlanta area were women, and six of those women were Asian. Their deaths have called attention to the rising number of crimes against Asian Americans in the past year and on the treatment of women involved in sex work.
Investigators have not yet ruled out hate-crime charges, but there are legal requirements to be met. Under federal law, prosecutors must prove the victims were targeted because of factors such as race or gender to meet the standard.
Successful prosecutions usually involve text messages, Internet posts or witnesses who can back up claims about the accused’s views.
So far, that sort of evidence hasn’t turned up against the suspect, Robert Aaron Long, 21, who apparently patronized at least two of the spas he targeted.
Long admitted to the slayings, said officials who insist he was motivated not by racial hate, but by a sex addiction, and was trying to “eliminate” the “temptation” the spas made him feel.
Multiple reports have linked the targeted locations with a history of prostitution.
All three of the spas had dozens of reviews dating back years on the Web site Rubmaps, where customers write detailed reviews of their experiences, including describing women’s ethnicities, ages and physical features, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.
Recent reviews for two of the locations, Aromatherapy and Gold Spa in Atlanta, both claimed sexual intercourse took place, the newspaper reported.
Police records showed 10 prostitution related arrests at Aromatherapy and Gold Spa, but none since 2013.
Local authorities are also investigating if the attacks meet the standard for hate crimes under Georgia’s law, passed last year.
Officials said Friday they have not yet determined if there is enough evidence for such charges.
Long currently faces eight counts of murder and one of aggravated assault in the wounding of a ninth victim.
On Saturday, a GoFundMe campaign set up for two brothers whose mother, Hyun Jung Grant, 51, died in the shooting had collected $2.5 million in donations. With Wires
The massacres at three massage parlors in the Atlanta area this week, leaving eight human beings dead, others injured, and their families scarred, were horrifying. Read the deeply moving story about the son of one of the women killed to remind yourself of this. It’s brutal. The grief will spread and resonate some more.
But this story has also been deeply instructive about our national discourse and the state of the American mainstream and elite media. This story’s coverage is proof, it seems to me, that American journalists have officially abandoned the habit of attempting any kind of “objectivity” in reporting these stories. We are now in the enlightened social justice world of “moral clarity” and “narrative-shaping.”
Here’s the truth: We don’t yet know why this man did these horrible things. It’s probably complicated, or, as my therapist used to say, “multi-determined.” That’s why we have thorough investigationsand trials in America. We only have one solid piece of information as to motive, which is the confession by the mass killer to law enforcement: that he was a religious fundamentalist who was determined to live up to chastity and repeatedly failed, as is often the case.
Like the 9/11 bomber sort he mass murder er at the Pulse nightclub, he took out his angst on the source of what he saw as his temptation and committed mass murder. This is evil in the classic fundamentalist sense: a perversion of religion and sexual repression into violence.
We should not take the killer’s confession as definitive, of course. But we can probe it — and indeed, his story is backed up by acquaintances and friends and family. The New York Times originally ran one piece reporting this out. The Washington Post also followed up, with one piece citing contemporaneous evidence of the man’s “religious mania” and sexual compulsion.
It appears that the man frequented at least two of the spas he attacked. He chose the spas, his ex roommates said, because he thought they were safer than other ways to get easy sex. The NY T ran a second piece which confirms that the killer had indeed been in rehab for sexual impulses, was a religious fanatic, and his next target was going to be “a business tied to the pornography industry.”
We have yet to find any credible evidence of anti-Asian hatred or bigotry in this man’ s history. Maybe we will. We can’ t rule it out. But we do know that his roommates say they once asked him if he picked the spas for sex because the women were Asian. And they say he denied it, saying he thought those spas were just the safe st way to have quick sex. That needs to be checked out more. But the only piece of evidence about possible anti-Asian bias points away, not toward it.
And yet. Well, you know what’s coming. Accompanying one original piece on the known facts, the NYT ran nine — nine! — separate stories about the incident as part of the narrative that this was an anti-Asian hate crime, fueled by white supremacy and/or misogyny.
Not to be outdone, the WaP or an 16 separate stories on the incident as an anti Asian white supremacist hate crime. Sixteen! One story for the facts; sixteen stories on how critical race theory would interpret the event regardless of the facts.
For good measure, one of their columnists denounced reporting of law enforcement’s version of events in the newspaper, because it distracted attention from the “real” motives. Recently, the NYT ran yet another full-on critical theory piece disguised as news on how these murders are proof of structural racism and sexism — because some activists say they are.
Nikole Hannah-Jones, the most powerful journalist at The New York Times, took to Twitter in the early morning of March 17 to pronounce: “Last night’s shooting and the appalling rise in anti-Asian violence stem from a sick society where nationalism has been stoked and normalized.” Ibram Kendi tweeted: “Locking arms with Asian Americans facing this lethal wave of anti-Asian terror. Their struggle is my struggle. Our struggle is against racism and White Supremacist domestic terror.”
In The Root, the real reason for the murders was detailed: “White supremacy is a virus that, like other viruses, will not die until there are no bodies left for it to infect. Which means the only way to stop it is to locate it, isolate it,
extract it, and kill it.”
None of them mentioned that the shooter killed two white people as well — a weird thing for a white supremacist to do — and injured a Latino. None pointed out that the connection between the spas was that the killer had visited them. None explained why, if he were associating Asian people with COVID-19, he would nonetheless expose himself to the virus by having sex with them, or regard these spas as “safer” than other ways to have quick sex.
They didn’t because, in their worldview, they didn’t need to. What you see here is social justice ideology insisting, as Dean Baquet temporarily explained, that intent doesn’t matter. What matters is impact. The individual killer is in some ways irrelevant. His intentions are not material. He is merely a vehicle for the structural oppressive forces critical theorists believe in. And this “story” is what the media elites decided to concentrate on: the thing that, so far as we know, didn’t happen.
Notice how Critical Race Theory operates. The only evidence it needs it already has. Check out the identity of the victim or victims, check out the identity of the culprit, and it’s all you need to know. If the victims are white, they don’t really count. Everything in America is driven by white supremacist hate of some sort or other. You can jam any fact, any phenomenon, into this rubric in order to explain it.
There’s a reason for this shift. Treating the individual as unique, granting him or her rights, defending the presumption of innocence, relying on provable, objective evidence: These core liberal principles are precisely what critical theory aims to deconstruct. And the elite media is in the vanguard of this war on liberalism.
This isn’t in any way to deny increasing bias against Asian Americans. It’s real and it’s awful. Asians are targeted by elite leftists, who actively discriminate against them in higher education, and attempt to dismantle the meritbased schools where Asian-American students succeed — precisely and only because too many Asians are attending. For Trump to give these forces a top-spin with the “China virus” made things even worse, of course.
But the theory behind hate crimes law is that these crimes matter more because they terrify so many beyond the actual victim. And so it seems to me that the media’s primary role in cases like these is providing some data and perspective on what’s actually happening, to allay irrational fear. Instead they contribute to the distortion.
The media is supposed to subject easy, convenient rush-to-judgment narratives to ruthless empirical testing. Now, for purely ideological reasons, they are rushing to promote readymade narratives, which actually point away from the empirical facts. It’s fanning ir rational fear in the cause of ideological indoctrination.