New York Post

You gotta be Joe-king

- CHARLES C.W. COOKE

AXIOS reports that President Biden has been consulting with historians in his quest to figure out who he is — and that, right on cue, those historians have suggested that Biden is a Great Man who has been sent to completely overhaul the United States.

Among the ideas with which the president’s consultant­s apparently agreed are that now is the time for Biden to “jam through once-in-alifetime historic changes to America,” that he must “go even bigger and faster than anyone expected,” and that it would be a good idea for him to “jam through what could amount to a $5 trillion overhaul of America, and vast changes to voting, immigratio­n and inequality.”

Evidently, the Biden years are set to involve a lot of “jamming.”

Let us mince no words: This advice is deranged. FDR and LBJ, to whom the historians apparently have compared Biden, were both swept into office in landslide victories, alongside large congressio­nal majorities — often large supermajor­ities — that were on board with their agenda. Joe Biden, by contrast, won the Electoral College by 45,000 votes, enjoys no majority in the Senate, and has a House majority so thin that the Democratic Party is trying to steal a House seat in Iowa that has already been certified for the GOP.

As Lloyd Bentsen might have said: I’ve read about FDR, and Joe Biden, you are no FDR.

Does Joe Biden know this? Thanks to the Republican­s’ suicidal post-election behavior, it will certainly be much easier for the Democratic Party to spend gobs of cash that we don’t have — and, maybe, to put some of that spending on a permanent footing. This represents no small alteration and should be resisted at all cost. But the remaining areas in which Biden hopes to make “once-in-alifetime historic changes” represent an entirely different story.

Axios suggests that Biden “loves the growing narrative that he’s bolder and bigger-thinking than President Obama,” and I daresay that he does; for a certain sort of mediocrity, being fluffed by Michael Beschloss and Ezra Klein is a dream come true. But the important questions remain the same now as they were before that narrative emerged — and, indeed, remain the same as they were during Obama’s interrupte­d tenure. What does Congress think? What do voters think? And how do those two inquiries intersect?

Here, we come back to earth. In Politico’s Playbook, a former Obama administra­tion staffer suggests that the growing willingnes­s of individual Democratic senators to put their foot down on issues that are important to them “shows that Biden isn’t feared on the Hill. He’s no LBJ.” Having establishe­d that, Playbook goes on to confirm just how precarious the entire Democratic agenda will remain even if the Senate were to abolish the legislativ­e filibuster.

Immigratio­n reform? Uh oh. Per a Morning Consult poll, “Forty-three percent of voters overall believe that undocument­ed immigrants who are currently living in the U.S. should have a pathway to citizenshi­p — down 14 points since January.” That includes just 25 percent of Republican­s and 57 percent of Democrats.

Gun control? Seems unlikely. A ban on “assault weapons” is not even on the table, and, because the various players have such dramatical­ly different conception­s of what is acceptable, any push for “universal background checks” is unlikely to get to 50 votes.

Voting? H.R.1 may be well-supported in the press, but it’s a total mess of a bill, it is vehemently opposed by the Republican Party, it has been savaged by election officials in West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin’s home state, and it contains a host of provisions that are, frankly, spectacula­rly unpopular across all political and demographi­c groups.

And climate change? Well, if you really believe that the “Green New Deal” would be popular — even among Democratic constituen­cies — I’ve got a carbon-neutral bridge to sell you.

Which leaves . . . what? DC statehood? Not only is that unconstitu­tional, it’s a 70-30 issue in Republican­s’ favor. Packing the Supreme Court? That doesn’t appeal to more than a third of Democrats. Single-payer health care? Now we’re just getting silly.

If Axios is correct about Biden’s mindset, then Biden has perpetrate­d a monumental fraud on the American public. For the man whose quiet pitch was more “return to normalcy” than “fundamenta­lly transform,” to believe that he is the Progressiv­e Chosen One would be an extraordin­ary thing indeed. Biden is there to play caretaker, to serve as a stand-in, to represent compromise in a deeply divided nation.

“Overhaul of America?” You and whose army?

Adapted with permission from National Review.

 ??  ?? GLORY DAZE: Historians apparently have led Joe Biden, only two months into his term, to believe that he can be a transforma­tive president.
GLORY DAZE: Historians apparently have led Joe Biden, only two months into his term, to believe that he can be a transforma­tive president.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States